Re: new module 'strerror_r-posix' (was: Re: strerror thread-safety?)

On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 03:09:51 +0100 Bruno Haible wrote: > Include: > > > License: > LGPL > > Maintainer: > Bruno Haible May I ask that the license be LGPLv2+? Thank you, Adam

Re: posix_spawn* license change request

On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:40:39 -0400 Adam Stokes wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:34:11 +0200 > Bruno Haible wrote: > > > Hi Adam, > > > > > Is it possible to have posix_spawn* licenses relaxed to LGPLv2+? > > > > For what package is this? > >

Re: posix_spawn* license change request

On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:34:11 +0200 Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Adam, > > > Is it possible to have posix_spawn* licenses relaxed to LGPLv2+? > > For what package is this? > > Have you considered releasing this package under LGPLv3+ instead of > LGPLv2+? You know about the advantages of GPLv3+ and

posix_spawn* license change request

Hi Bruno, Is it possible to have posix_spawn* licenses relaxed to LGPLv2+? Thank you, Adam

license alteration for chown/lchown

Is it possible to change these modules licenses to LGPLv2+? Thank you -Adam