Hi Paul,
Paul Smith wrote:
> > If I compare the configure output from a run with using the cache
> > (fails) with one that doesn't use the cache (succeeds) the only
> > difference of interest is:
>
> -checking for sigprocmask... (cached) 1
> +checking for sigprocmask... yes
> ...
> -ch
* doc/posix-functions/fcntl.texi (fcntl): Document
OpenIndiana, GNU/Linux, FreeBSD on NFS files.
---
ChangeLog | 6 ++
doc/posix-functions/fcntl.texi | 8
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index cec93905a..b078da4d3 100644
--- a
On Sun, 2020-08-02 at 18:58 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> If I compare the configure output from a run with using the cache
> (fails) with one that doesn't use the cache (succeeds) the only
> difference of interest is:
>
> @@ -378,7 +379,7 @@
>checking whether program_invocation_name is declare
On Sun, 2020-08-02 at 17:54 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> The latest Bison release 3.7.1 is not compiling for me, and it
> appears to be a gnulib issue.
>
> Here's the failure:
>
> gcc -DEXEEXT=\"\" -I. -I./lib -Ibison-3.7.1 -Ibison-3.7.1/lib \
> -DDEFAULT_TEXT_DOMAIN=\"bison-gnulib\" -march=nehal
The latest Bison release 3.7.1 is not compiling for me, and it appears
to be a gnulib issue.
Here's the failure:
gcc -DEXEEXT=\"\" -I. -I./lib -Ibison-3.7.1 -Ibison-3.7.1/lib \
-DDEFAULT_TEXT_DOMAIN=\"bison-gnulib\" -march=nehalem -mtune=intel \
-ffile-prefix-map=bison-3.7.1/= -O2 -fPIC -stat
In an application that uses an ordered set (gl_oset), I need an iterator
that starts at the first element that has a value >= threshold. And it
should be fast in the case when only 1 or 2 or 3 elements from that iterator
are needed, but the entire set is large.
It can't be realized with the existin
The threshold argument in the search_atleast method is meant to be unrelated
to the ELTYPE or KEYTYPE types, respectively.
2020-08-02 Bruno Haible
oset-c++, omap-c++: Remove restriction for search_atleast method.
* lib/gl_oset.hh (gl_OSet::search_atleast): Allow the threshold
On 02.08.20 15:41, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Tim Rühsen wrote:
>> The surrounding code in lib/signal.h is
>> #if 1
>> # if !0
>
> Huh? HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALBLOCKING evaluates to 0 ?!
>
> There was a change to m4/signalblocking.m4 recently, but for me it works.
> Can you take a look at the "checking for s
Tim Rühsen wrote:
> The surrounding code in lib/signal.h is
> #if 1
> # if !0
Huh? HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALBLOCKING evaluates to 0 ?!
There was a change to m4/signalblocking.m4 recently, but for me it works.
Can you take a look at the "checking for sigprocmask..." test in
config.log?
Bruno
Hi Tim,
> after updating gnulib, I see this on all CI pipelines (Debian, Fedora,
> Alpine, Arch, ...):
>
> In file included from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/param.h:28,
> from ./minmax.h:34,
> from md2.c:30:
> ./signal.h:682:13: error: size of array 'verify
Hey,
after updating gnulib, I see this on all CI pipelines (Debian, Fedora,
Alpine, Arch, ...):
In file included from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/param.h:28,
from ./minmax.h:34,
from md2.c:30:
./signal.h:682:13: error: size of array 'verify_NSIG_constraint'
11 matches
Mail list logo