Hi Bruno,
> https://haible.de/bruno/gnu/testdir-unicodeio.tar.gz ?
make check passed both on Solaris 11.3 & 11.4.
> It is succeeds this test, then what is the difference between the
> coreutils printf program and the test-unicodeio.c program? Both call
> setlocale (LC_ALL, "").
I do not unde
Hi Kiyoshi-san,
> FYI, also checked on Solaris 11.4 x86/x64, and had the same result.
Whereas I checked Solaris 11.3 (x86 and sparc) and Solaris 11.4 (x86),
and had no issue with the newly added unit test.
Can you please configure, build, and 'make check' the package
https://haible.de/bruno/gn
Hi Bruno, Hi Akim,
FYI, also checked on Solaris 11.4 x86/x64, and had the same result.
$ uname -a
SunOS hidden 5.11 11.4.0.15.0 i86pc i386 i86pc
$ LC_ALL=C $coreutilsbin/printf '\u2022\n' | od -t x1
000 3f 0a
002
$ LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 $coreutilsbin/printf '\u2022\n' | od -t x1
000
Hi Bruno,
1)
$ locale
LANG=C
LC_CTYPE="C"
LC_NUMERIC="C"
LC_TIME="C"
LC_COLLATE="C"
LC_MONETARY="C"
LC_MESSAGES="C"
LC_ALL=
2)
$ ldd $coreutilsbin/printf
libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1
Regards,
--- Kiyoshi
- Original Message -
> From: Bruno Haible
> To: bug-gnulib@gnu.org
Hi Akim, Kiyoshi-san,
> Unfortunately on Kiyoshi's environment (SunOS hidden 5.11 11.3 i86pc i386
> i86pc,
> GCC 9.3.0) we get '?' instead of '.' in the C locale. We get a genuine ASCII
> '?', it's not some fallback from the terminal which fails to display the
> character. And we properly get t
