Re: bug#34951: [PATCH] grep: a kwset matcher not work in a grep matcher

2019-03-22 Thread Budi
How make grep walinh through FS by scanning breadth first instead of the usual depth On 3/23/19, Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 08:06:35 +0900 > Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > >> A kwset matcher is not built in a grep matcher after token re-order is >> introduced in commit 5c7a0371823876

Re: bug#34951: [PATCH] grep: a kwset matcher not work in a grep matcher

2019-03-22 Thread Budi
How make grep walking through FS by scanning breadth first instead of On 3/23/19, Budi wrote: > How make grep walinh through FS by scanning breadth first instead of > the usual depth > > On 3/23/19, Norihiro Tanaka wrote: >> On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 08:06:35 +0900 >> Norihiro Tanaka wrote: >> >>> A

Re: bug#34951: [PATCH] grep: a kwset matcher not work in a grep matcher

2019-03-22 Thread Norihiro Tanaka
On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 08:06:35 +0900 Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > A kwset matcher is not built in a grep matcher after token re-order is > introduced in commit 5c7a0371823876cca7a1347fa09ca26bbbff0c98 in dfa. > It caused performance degradation in some typical cases. This bug is > introduced in grep-3

[PATCH] grep: a kwset matcher not work in a grep matcher

2019-03-22 Thread Norihiro Tanaka
A kwset matcher is not built in a grep matcher after token re-order is introduced in commit 5c7a0371823876cca7a1347fa09ca26bbbff0c98 in dfa. It caused performance degradation in some typical cases. This bug is introduced in grep-3.2. DFAMUST() does not work if tokens which are parsed in dfa match

Re: While cross compiling, assume the gcc signbit support for the musl as well

2019-03-22 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, Many people refuse to click on URLs that are hosted on an unknown domain, moreover with the word 'click' and a long identifier in it. This is the kind of URL that is most often used to invade our privacy and steal our secrets. Could you therefore please write a self-contained mail (no URLs)?

Re: While cross compiling, assume the gcc signbit support for the musl as well

2019-03-22 Thread Eric Blake
On 3/22/19 12:31 PM, Necktwi Ozfguah wrote: > Please patch the gnulib with > https://u7535577.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=S8VPHvg5-2FzxqlLfWXPq42mUxcZDSyC3MqblYskqrUpUxEeXj2ty4PFy2n-2BuTk72hD1MBwWBQhPZQm9-2FjzWfaTam8LAKZgRnJaqW2A7Bwxgbx-2FknGWQJOWHXuaHJTvXOh_xXjksHEkT5Azm40kLn-2F-2BTLbhdQ6JTRXNvW

Re: While cross compiling, assume the gcc signbit support for the musl as well

2019-03-22 Thread Necktwi Ozfguah
>From 56482aa68e71f2ef17ef42163023d78b3ffd35e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Necktwi Ozfghua Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 22:34:17 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] m4/signbit.m4: signbit support is assumed with musl while cross building, signbit support is assumed with glibc so should be with musl. Signed-off-

While cross compiling, assume the gcc signbit support for the musl as well

2019-03-22 Thread Necktwi Ozfguah
Please patch the gnulib with https://u7535577.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=S8VPHvg5-2FzxqlLfWXPq42mUxcZDSyC3MqblYskqrUpUxEeXj2ty4PFy2n-2BuTk72hD1MBwWBQhPZQm9-2FjzWfaTam8LAKZgRnJaqW2A7Bwxgbx-2FknGWQJOWHXuaHJTvXOh_xXjksHEkT5Azm40kLn-2F-2BTLbhdQ6JTRXNvWHWgEemmRmZ9kYxKPUO5OrxTI4CK2U-2FBnPN4EijU2GSGQgU

Re: undefined behaviour findings in bitset

2019-03-22 Thread Akim Demaille
Hi Bruno, > Le 19 mars 2019 à 07:07, Akim Demaille a écrit : > > Hi Bruno, > >> Le 18 mars 2019 à 22:03, Bruno Haible a écrit : >> >> Hi Akim, >> >>> Also, the relationship with noreturn.h is not completely clear for >>> me either. >> >> There are a couple of comment in noreturn.h lines 33.