Re: [netcf-devel] Re: netcf - anyone here for an "other operating system (but not (Solaris))"

2016-11-01 Thread Michael Felt
On 01-Nov-16 15:52, Eric Blake wrote: Which version of GNU m4? There are some particular m4 bugs in some older versions that kill configure scripts, so the bootstrap script intentionally blacklists m4 versions with those bugs. missed this. 1.4.17

Re: [PATCH] utimensat: remove FIXME for old Linux kernels

2016-11-01 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > > Should this change be accompanied with a documentation change > > in doc/posix-functions/utimensat.texi ? > > It's not strictly needed, as Gnulib still works around bugs in older > systems, it's just that 'configure' now defaults to assuming the older > bugs don't exist in

Re: [PATCH] utimensat: remove FIXME for old Linux kernels

2016-11-01 Thread Paul Eggert
On 11/01/2016 11:20 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: Should this change be accompanied with a documentation change in doc/posix-functions/utimensat.texi ? It's not strictly needed, as Gnulib still works around bugs in older systems, it's just that 'configure' now defaults to assuming the older bugs do

Re: avoid new GCC-7-exposed warnings

2016-11-01 Thread Eric Blake
On 10/14/2016 11:47 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > I tried to build the coreutils using very recent GCC 7, built from > latest git, and encountered a few new warnings (errors when configured > with --enable-gcc-warnings), so wrote the following to address them. > With these, everything now compiles warn

Re: [PATCH] utimensat: remove FIXME for old Linux kernels

2016-11-01 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Paul, > We no longer need to worry > about Linux kernel 2.6.32 when building with newer kernels. Should this change be accompanied with a documentation change in doc/posix-functions/utimensat.texi ? And what about m4/futimens.m4 and doc/posix-functions/futimens.texi ? Bruno

[PATCH] utimensat: remove FIXME for old Linux kernels

2016-11-01 Thread Paul Eggert
* lib/utimensat.c (rpl_utimensat): Update FIXME comment. * m4/utimensat.m4 (gl_FUNC_UTIMENSAT): Belatedy do a "simplify this in 2012" FIXME, by assuming the file system bug is absent unless demonstrated to be present. We no longer need to worry about Linux kernel 2.6.32 when building with newer ke

Re: [netcf-devel] Re: netcf - anyone here for an "other operating system (but not (Solaris))"

2016-11-01 Thread Eric Blake
[re-adding gnulib; please remember to reply all] On 11/01/2016 09:16 AM, Michael Felt wrote: >> [adding gnulib] >> >> Can you figure out which sed script in the bootstrap script is >> triggering this extra output, and/or provide the edits that work for >> you, as you hinted above? > In get_versio

Re: [netcf-devel] Re: netcf - anyone here for an "other operating system (but not (Solaris))"

2016-11-01 Thread Eric Blake
[adding gnulib] On 11/01/2016 08:47 AM, mich...@felt.demon.nl wrote: > ok - how do I submit a patch. 'git send-email' is preferred, but any way of creating the patch and mailing it to the list can probably work as a starting point. > > An issue I have is the syntax for sed in ./bootstrap. If b