* lib/getprogname.c: Include stdlib.h, for getexecname decl.
(getprogname) [HAVE_GETEXECNAME]: Use that, for Solaris 10.
* m4/getprogname.m4 (gl_FUNC_GETPROGNAME): Check for getexecname.
---
ChangeLog | 5 +
lib/getprogname.c | 12 ++--
m4/getprogname.m4 | 4 ++--
3 files cha
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> From the output of that mingw configure run, it appears they are not
>> declared -- at least not in any header included by this particular
>> test program:
>>
>> checking whether program_invocation_name is declared...
Jim Meyering wrote:
> From the output of that mingw configure run, it appears they are not
> declared -- at least not in any header included by this particular
> test program:
>
> checking whether program_invocation_name is declared... no
> checking whether program_invocation_short_name is de
Problem reported by Joseph Myers in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg00340.html
* doc/posix-headers/stdalign.texi: Do not imply that C11 prohibits
alignof(S) where S is a structure containing a flexible array
member. The Gnulib substitute does not support this, but C11 does.
---
Cha
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 13:13:52 CEST T J wrote:
>> Anyway, it appears that this has not been tested on Windows/MinGW as
>> it currently does not work. Everything worked fine with the old
>> progname module.
>>
>> A sample b
Hello,
I had some trouble posting to the list, so I'm not sure if my previous message
got through or not. I apologise if it has.
Anyway, it appears that this has not been tested on Windows/MinGW as it
currently does not work. Everything worked fine with the old progname module.
A sample bui
Hi Jeremy,
On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 13:13:52 CEST T J wrote:
> Anyway, it appears that this has not been tested on Windows/MinGW as
> it currently does not work. Everything worked fine with the old
> progname module.
>
> A sample build log is here:
> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/fontforge
On Monday, 5 September 2016 21:47:31 CEST Jim Meyering wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Pino Toscano wrote:
> >> On Saturday, 3 September 2016 20:47:15 CEST Jim Meyering wrote:
> > ...
> >> Another thing: should some deprecation warn
