On 06/02/2016 02:26 PM, David Seifert wrote:
We could relax the whole thing a bit, and maybe just make a plain
__cplusplus check, without a version number. This keeps the C side as
it always has been, but allows C++'s proper literals to kick in.
In addition, _Bool is also a major obstacle, as it
On Mi, 2016-06-01 at 11:22 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 06/01/2016 01:29 AM, David Seifert wrote:
> >
> > stdbool.m4 is supposed to merely check that
> > stdbool.h fulfills C99 requirements. Why does it then necessarily
> > check whether bool is a
> > defined _macro_?
> Because C99 (and C11) re
Any additional information necessary?
/haubi/
On 03/17/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Native PowerPC AIX tools do accept only 32 bit objects by default.
They either need the -X32_64 commandline flag to accept both, or the
OBJECT_MODE=64 environment variable to switch to accepting 64
