Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I was wondering about a more general check in the m4 file
> that verified all our internal values against the system wcwidth(),
> though perhaps that is too draconian and dependent on system
> fonts etc. rather than unicode standards?
Yes I think this would be too draconian.
On 01/20/2016 11:59 AM, Aharon Robbins wrote:
I don't see that. In regex.h:
| struct re_pattern_buffer
| {
| /* Space that holds the compiled pattern. It is declared as
| `unsigned char *' because its elements are sometimes used as
| array indexes. */
| unsigned char *__REPB_PRE
Thanks, I installed this in your name. It's nice to see you around;
please come by more often!
Thanks, I installed that too.
On 21/01/16 10:32, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote in
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00057.html:
>> OpenBSD 5.8, x86_64, GCC 4.2.1
>> coreutils:
>> PASS: 428
>> SKIP: 152
>> gnulib:
>> PASS: 273
>> SKIP: 34
>> FAIL: 1
>>test-wcwidth.c:71: as
Pádraig Brady wrote in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00057.html:
> OpenBSD 5.8, x86_64, GCC 4.2.1
> coreutils:
> PASS: 428
> SKIP: 152
> gnulib:
> PASS: 273
> SKIP: 34
> FAIL: 1
>test-wcwidth.c:71: assertion 'wcwidth (0x3000) == 2' failed
>Seems we
Hi,
In lib/hash-pjw-bare.h a comment says that the function's result depends on
the signedness of 'char'. But in fact it does not: the function does not
use the 'char' type at all.
Already reported by Paul in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-09/msg00156.html
Here's a suggested c
