On 08/10/15 13:47, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Pass only SOCK_* flags to accept4, as they are the only documented
> ones, and passing others may trigger EINVAL.
> * tests/test-accept4.c: (main): Pass SOCK_CLOEXEC instead of
> O_CLOEXEC | O_BINARY to accept4.
> ---
> ChangeLog| 7 +++
> t
Pass only SOCK_* flags to accept4, as they are the only documented
ones, and passing others may trigger EINVAL.
* tests/test-accept4.c: (main): Pass SOCK_CLOEXEC instead of
O_CLOEXEC | O_BINARY to accept4.
---
ChangeLog| 7 +++
tests/test-accept4.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 9 inse
Hi,
currently, test-accept4 asserts on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE, as the errno
returned on accept4 failures is reported as EINVAL (and not EBADF as
expected).
The issue is due to wrong flags passed to accept4 in the test itself:
both the Linux [1] and the FreeBSD [2] man pages document only SOCK_*
fla
