On 07/11/2014 02:10 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
are you arguing that any shell that provides 'set -o pipefail' should
ALSO provide a knob to explicitly treat death due to SIGPIPE as not
impacting pipefail? At which point, then you DO want to re-enable
rather than ignore SIGPIPE, and don't have to worr
On 07/11/2014 02:58 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 07/08/2014 12:42 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> It is unclear
>> at this point whether POSIX would recommend that filter
>> applications should_always_ exit with 0 status on pipe failure,
>> or only do this for EPIPE write failures when SIGPIPE is ignored,
On 07/08/2014 12:42 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
It is unclear
at this point whether POSIX would recommend that filter
applications should_always_ exit with 0 status on pipe failure,
or only do this for EPIPE write failures when SIGPIPE is ignored,
or whether it should be optional behavior that must be
Fix by Andreas Schwab in:
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-06/msg00503.html
* lib/regcomp.c (parse_reg_exp): Deallocate partially
constructed tree before returning error.
---
ChangeLog | 8
lib/regcomp.c | 6 +-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On 07/11/2014 02:45 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
Thanks, it seems to be a compiler bug on Ubuntu: "#pragma weak" doesn't work,
and this breaks gnulib's glthread module. For what it's worth I filed a bug report here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-defaults/+bug/1340250
Are you expert
Bernhard Voelker writes:
> On 07/11/2014 03:13 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote:
>> Could you provide an example of the build failures with 0.19.1?
>
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/Base:System/coreutils/openSUSE_Factory/i586
>
> [ 172s] *** Error in `/usr/bin/xgettext': realloc(): inval
On 07/11/2014 03:13 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote:
Could you provide an example of the build failures with 0.19.1?
https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/Base:System/coreutils/openSUSE_Factory/i586
[ 172s] *** Error in `/usr/bin/xgettext': realloc(): invalid pointer:
0x098f4ea8 ***
[ 172s
* Daiki Ueno (u...@gnu.org) [20140711 15:13]:
> Could you provide an example of the build failures with 0.19.1? Yes,
> 0.19 had such problems[1], but with 0.19.1 we haven't received any single
> bug report that affects building other packages, except this:
I'll send you ex
Philipp Thomas writes:
> The number of packages that failed to build with 0.19.1 was too high
> to be acceptable and the person who did the update refused to resolve
> the problems with the the affected packages the update was rejected. I
> just requested the update again so let's see whether it
* Bernhard Voelker (m...@bernhard-voelker.de) [20140710 10:27]:
> puh, for me as openSUSE user this means that I have to build
> gettext on my hosts, as the latest release openSUSE-13.1 still
> uses 0.18.3.1 (and most probably won't upgrade)
It will most definitely not be updated to a newer versi
10 matches
Mail list logo
