On 02/13/2014 10:30 AM, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
Any objections to pushing the latest version of this patch to git head?
Thanks, it looks good to me. Maybe also fold in the attached minor
change, which simplifies the code and which I don't think will hurt
performance significantly. But it's n
Hi,
Any objections to pushing the latest version of this patch to git head?
Regards,
Sergey
Hi Ludovic,
> FWIW I think it’s very important that tar --sort=name remains the
> default, as it guarantees that archive production is deterministic.
Actually, the default is not to sort directory entries at all: tar
stores them in the same order as returned by the underlying system calls.
I don'
Hi,
Sergey Poznyakoff skribis:
> According to [1], using directory lists ordered by inode can speed up
> tar archivation by up to 40% on ext[34] filesystems (confirmed by my own
> measurements). Please take a look at the attached patch. Is it OK
> to apply?
FWIW I think it’s very important th
