On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> for now the new tag and fallback to --short-log fixes all
>>> the immediate problems I was having (except the reliance on gnu
Eric Blake wrote:
> This change needs to be incorporated upstream in gnulib (cc'd); from
> there it will find its way into the next m4 release.
What compiler is being used, and what macros does this compiler
predefine?
More generally:
Why is the change needed? What happens, exactly, if you don'
On 10/29/2013 07:29 PM, John Klos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to request that this tiny patch be fixed so that m4 will
> compile on NetBSD VAXen:
Wow - people still use VAX?
>
> --- lib/isnan.c.orig2013-09-22 06:15:20.0 +
> +++ lib/isnan.c
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ FUNC (DOUBLE x)
Hi Jim,
On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> for now the new tag and fallback to --short-log fixes all
>> the immediate problems I was having (except the reliance on gnupg-1.4
>> gpgv).
>
> You say that as if there were a
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> for now the new tag and fallback to --short-log fixes all
> the immediate problems I was having (except the reliance on gnupg-1.4
> gpgv).
You say that as if there were a problem with the maint.mk rule.
The rule relies on the existence of
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> However, isn't this based on the premise that shallow clones are
>> somehow useful?
>
> Sure. Why copy 8000 changesets when you know for sure that you only
> care about the last 100 or s
Hi Jim,
On Oct 29, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> However, isn't this based on the premise that shallow clones are
> somehow useful?
Sure. Why copy 8000 changesets when you know for sure that you only
care about the last 100 or so at the most?
> Did you try the recommended procedure
[adding bug-gnulib]
On 10/29/2013 11:15 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 03:50:20PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Since we haven't quite frozen yet, it's time to pick up some
>> fixes. I know at least cygwin benefits from this update.
>>
>> * .gnulib: Update to latest, in part
