Re: [libvirt] Build failed in Jenkins: libvirt-build #472

2013-01-02 Thread Eric Blake
[adding gnulib in cc] On 01/02/2013 03:03 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 01/02/2013 01:14 PM, Guido Günther wrote: > >> >> This is gcc 4.7.1 and eglibc 2.13. I upgraded to Debian Wheezy's current >> gcc 4.7.2 without any changes. I'm not able to reproduce it locally on a >> Debian sid system either.

Re: update-copyright copyright notice corruption bug

2013-01-02 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Eric Blake wrote: > The original was: > >Copyright (C) 1995,97,99 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > and that pattern (4-digits followed by 2-digits, with gaps in the years, > but no spaces in the listing) is not currently tested in the > update-copyright testsuite. I do

Re: update-copyright copyright notice corruption bug

2013-01-02 Thread Eric Blake
On 01/02/2013 12:31 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > A second check of the automatic copyright updates for glibc showed that > update-copyright had corrupted some of the copyright notices. I've > applied this glibc patch to fix that corruption. bug-gnulib: see > attachment for a testcase. Run upd

update-copyright copyright notice corruption bug

2013-01-02 Thread Joseph S. Myers
A second check of the automatic copyright updates for glibc showed that update-copyright had corrupted some of the copyright notices. I've applied this glibc patch to fix that corruption. bug-gnulib: see attachment for a testcase. Run update-copyright as: UPDATE_COPYRIGHT_FORCE=1 UPDATE_COPY

RFE: autobuild improvements

2013-01-02 Thread Eric Blake
Would it make sense to improve m4/autobuild.m4 to output a bit more information? For example, I just received a bug report of an automated build failure[1,2] managed by the Jenkins autobuilder[3], but while that particular setup captures the terminal output of './configure', it did not point me to

Re: isatty fails on Windows 8

2013-01-02 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Michael Goffioul < > michael.goffi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >>> > Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:02:03 -0500 >>> > From: Michael Goffioul >>> > >>> > W

Re: inconsistency in EILSEQ definition...

2013-01-02 Thread Joel Brobecker
> That's probably a bug in libiconv - POSIX says that EILSEQ and ENOENT > must be distinct. [...] > > In terms of the build error on Lynx178, what I ended up doing > > was compile with -DEILSEQ=ENOENT. > > This smells wrong, but at least it worked for you, while we figure out > how to fix things p

Re: isatty fails on Windows 8

2013-01-02 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Michael Goffioul < michael.goffi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> > Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:02:03 -0500 >> > From: Michael Goffioul >> > >> > We've got a bug report in octave [1] that seems to indicate that >> gn

Re: inconsistency in EILSEQ definition...

2013-01-02 Thread Eric Blake
On 01/02/2013 03:39 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello, > > A few weeks ago, I reported a problem to gnulib where the errno > module would still be missing the EILSEQ macro on systems that > do not define it (in this particular case: LynxOS 178): > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-

inconsistency in EILSEQ definition...

2013-01-02 Thread Joel Brobecker
Hello, A few weeks ago, I reported a problem to gnulib where the errno module would still be missing the EILSEQ macro on systems that do not define it (in this particular case: LynxOS 178): http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-10/msg00088.html The problem was solved by defining EILSE