On 12/21/2012 09:16 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 12/21/12 06:02, Eric Blake wrote:
>> But that gives me an idea for a simpler solution that DOES work with 2.59:
>
> Thanks for the bug report and suggestion -- I pushed this:
>
> --- a/ChangeLog
> +++ b/ChangeLog
> @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
> +2012-12-21 Pa
On 12/21/12 06:02, Eric Blake wrote:
> But that gives me an idea for a simpler solution that DOES work with 2.59:
Thanks for the bug report and suggestion -- I pushed this:
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+2012-12-21 Paul Eggert
+
+ AC_PROG_MKDIR_P: port workaround to pr
> > * m4/gnulib-common.m4 (AC_PROG_MKDIR_P):
> > Define only for Autoconf versions before 2.62.
> > (AC_C_RESTRICT): Use documented AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION, not
> > undocumented m4_PACKAGE_VERSION, for consistency with the
> > abovementioned change to AC_PROG_MKDIR_P. This should suffice
> > since we'
> > * m4/gnulib-common.m4 (AC_PROG_MKDIR_P):
> > Define only for Autoconf versions before 2.62.
> > (AC_C_RESTRICT): Use documented AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION, not
> > undocumented m4_PACKAGE_VERSION, for consistency with the
> > abovementioned change to AC_PROG_MKDIR_P. This should suffice
> > since we'
> * m4/gnulib-common.m4 (AC_PROG_MKDIR_P):
> Define only for Autoconf versions before 2.62.
> (AC_C_RESTRICT): Use documented AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION, not
> undocumented m4_PACKAGE_VERSION, for consistency with the
> abovementioned change to AC_PROG_MKDIR_P. This should suffice
> since we're checking
That change looks OK to me, not that I'm an OS X expert.
I'd like to hear Bruno's opinion on it before pushing.
Also, do you plan to make more changes along these lines?
This one's trivial, but if you do something nontrivial
we should get you started on signing papers for gnulib.
Thanks.
