Re: canonicalize_file_name does not support MS-Windows style file names

2012-12-10 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:52:52 -0800 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: m...@netris.org, br...@clisp.org, bug-gnulib@gnu.org > > On 12/09/12 22:31, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Ping! Could someone please commit this? TIA. > > I just now did that. Thanks for the patch. Thanks!

Re: canonicalize_file_name does not support MS-Windows style file names

2012-12-10 Thread Paul Eggert
On 12/09/12 22:31, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Ping! Could someone please commit this? TIA. I just now did that. Thanks for the patch.

Re: C locale *printf functions ?

2012-12-10 Thread John Darrington
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:34:07AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: Right, I'll work on those. What is vsnformat? I meant to type "vsnprintf" J' -- PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://keys.gnupg.net or any P

Re: xalloc: missing prototype

2012-12-10 Thread Paul Eggert
On 12/10/12 00:23, Akim Demaille wrote: > Maybe the non-inline branch should use __attribute__(__used__)? Sure, but you mean __unused__ not __used__, right? Here's an updated proposal. All I did was add _GL_UNUSED in the two lines of the non-inline branch. --- ChangeLog | 8

Re: C locale *printf functions ?

2012-12-10 Thread Ben Pfaff
Right, I'll work on those. What is vsnformat? John Darrington writes: > I gave it a rudimentary test and it seems to do what I want. > I will also need other related functions, though, Eg xasprintf, > vsnformat, etc. > > J' > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:59:44PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > J

Re: C locale *printf functions ?

2012-12-10 Thread John Darrington
I gave it a rudimentary test and it seems to do what I want. I will also need other related functions, though, Eg xasprintf, vsnformat, etc. J' On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:59:44PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: John Darrington writes: > Gnulib has a number of c-* variants of string proce

Re: xalloc: missing prototype

2012-12-10 Thread Akim Demaille
Le 9 déc. 2012 à 22:32, Paul Eggert a écrit : > On 12/09/2012 07:46 AM, Akim Demaille wrote: >> No, it does not. Actually, it breaks it completely. > > Ah, I expect it's because I forgot about the second branch in that #if. > How about this patch instead? Hi Paul, Thanks for addressing this.