On 11/02/2012 03:26 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Undefining "lint" in lib/config.h makes this test pass immediately.
>From what you describe, defining 'lint' is a no-no on your
platform, if you want your code to run correctly. This would
also explain the failure of test-sigaction. So I think
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 16:25 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On current Rawhide:
>
> CC test-fcntl-h.o
> test-fcntl-h.c:25:47: error: '__O_SYNC' undeclared here (not in a function)
>
> I suspect this is actually a glibc bug. The gnulib source uses
> O_SYNC and doesn't mention __O_SYNC
On current Rawhide:
CC test-fcntl-h.o
test-fcntl-h.c:25:47: error: '__O_SYNC' undeclared here (not in a function)
I suspect this is actually a glibc bug. The gnulib source uses
O_SYNC and doesn't mention __O_SYNC at all.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://peo
Hi Paul,
Am 31.10.2012 um 17:31 schrieb Paul Eggert :
> Thanks, but I'm afraid that's still not enough information.
> I don't know which assertion has failed, or why.
>
> Perhaps you can single-step through the failed programs?
> They shouldn't take long to run.
It looks like that SIGABRT does n
