On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 08:18:21AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 03:05 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:54:45AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> The F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC fix that Al Viro posted fixes 3/4 of the
> >> bugs, but I'm still investigating this one:
On 10/09/2012 03:05 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:54:45AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> The F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC fix that Al Viro posted fixes 3/4 of the
>> bugs, but I'm still investigating this one:
>>
>>> test-dup3.c:108: assertion failed
>>> # ASSERT (dup3 (fd
I'm testing the following patch.
Rich.
From 0944e30e12dec6544b3602626b60ff412375c78f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Richard W.M. Jones"
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 14:42:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] dup3: Return an error when oldfd == newfd.
The following commit:
commit fe17f22d7fd0e344ef6447238f79
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:54:45AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC fix that Al Viro posted fixes 3/4 of the
> bugs, but I'm still investigating this one:
>
> > test-dup3.c:108: assertion failed
> > # ASSERT (dup3 (fd, fd, o_flags) == -1);
Thanks to Jim for pointing out
The F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC fix that Al Viro posted fixes 3/4 of the
bugs, but I'm still investigating this one:
> test-dup3.c:108: assertion failed
> # ASSERT (dup3 (fd, fd, o_flags) == -1);
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: F
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:21:58PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:53:25PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:50:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > [.. discussion on gnulib test-cloexec test snipped ..]
> > > I'm suspicious this is a kernel bug
