On 09/01/2012 02:23 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> every program that uses gnulib must run xgettext on
> gnulib source code
Yes, that's how it works now.
> Should gnulib generate .pot and maintain its own translations?
That's been proposed, yes, but nobody's gotten around to doing
it. Trans
On 09/01/12 02:23, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
Hi,
I see gnulib use gettext(), but it does not setup its own domain,
I have much the same question. My "libopts" library will be used
by both NTP (currently) and sharutils (shortly). It would seem wasteful
to translate the same strings multiple
Akim Demaille wrote:
...
> So, Karl, Jim, and others, would you accept that gendocs.sh
> stopped generating a compressed tarball of split info files,
> but would rather ship a compressed --no-split file?
Sounds fine to me, but gendocs.sh is Karl's baby ;-)
Hi,
Paul Eggert skribis:
> On 08/28/2012 05:13 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Since that same test passes just fine on a Solaris 10 system
>> to which I have access, I'm going to ignore it for now.
>
> The same test also passes on a Solaris 11 system
> that I have access to, so perhaps it's somethin
Hi,
I see gnulib use gettext(), but it does not setup its own domain,
which means it'll use the main program's domain. I don't see how this
works because then every program that uses gnulib must run xgettext on
gnulib source code, then translators may have to translat the same
strings over again f
