How about using the generic Digest module instead?
Something like this (totally untested) patch:
diff --git a/build-aux/announce-gen b/build-aux/announce-gen
index 3ca90a9..c453d44 100755
--- a/build-aux/announce-gen
+++ b/build-aux/announce-gen
@@ -29,8 +29,7 @@ my $VERSION = '2012-01-06 07:46';
Hi Mandeep,
> i am interested in your project REIMPLEMENT GNULIB TOOL IN
> PYTHON.
Sure, please, we're awaiting your application!
> i am good in java and even i had done a project in java(Student
> database management system) and it was good.May i know is python required
> for this,beacause i do
Implementing Jim's suggestions.
>From 3e6c32b5834341ee8d1870f7b85db546b1a1f2d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Reuben Thomas
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:17:22 +
Subject: [PATCH] announce-gen: make it use Digest::SHA where available.
* build-aux/announce-gen: Use either Digest::SHA1 or Digest::
Reuben Thomas wrote:
> The following patch copes with a renamed module:
It appears that it hasn't been renamed, but rather replaced,
at least in Debian.
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianPerlGroup/OpenTasks/Transitions/DigestSHA1ToDigestSHA
> From: Reuben Thomas
> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:
hello sir...i am interested in your project REIMPLEMENT GNULIB TOOL IN
PYTHON. i am good in java and even i had done a project in java(Student
database management system) and it was good.May i know is python required
for this,beacause i don't know much about python..hoping a positive
response..
Tha
The following patch copes with a renamed module:
>From 670ec3363bbbfefe927de0100a4be6f5f556a332 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Reuben Thomas
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:17:22 +
Subject: [PATCH] announce-gen: make it work with Perl 5.14.
* build-aux/announce-gen: Use either Digest::SHA1 or Dige
On 03/20/2012 01:52 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, there's nothing that does "git push
> --tags" in README-release. Is that right? If so, I'll provide a patch.
Pushing all tags may be too drastic (I tend to keep local tags that I
don't want pushed). It's more appropriate
Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, there's nothing that does "git push
> --tags" in README-release. Is that right? If so, I'll provide a patch.
You don't want to push all tags.
This pushes the just-created tag:
* Push the NEWS-updating changes and the new tag:
v=$(cat .prev
Unless I'm missing something, there's nothing that does "git push
--tags" in README-release. Is that right? If so, I'll provide a patch.
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org
Pulling a bunch of GNULIB_POSIXCHECK-inspired modules into coreutils
made it so that package is now compiling a few more test programs,
which evoked these failures:
test-posix_spawn1.c: In function 'main':
test-posix_spawn1.c:78:3: error: initialization discards 'const' qualifier
from pointer
Reuben Thomas wrote:
> A slight simplification:
>
>>From 4ab7998acbf4f829fdecabd83dc75beedcdffea1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Reuben Thomas
> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:37:21 +
> Subject: [PATCH] README-release: simplify slightly
>
> * top/README-release: only run "git checkout master" onc
On 03/18/2012 05:52 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> git-merge-changelog is maintained in gnulib, so bug reports should go
> to bug-gnulib@gnu.org, not bug-gnu-gett...@gnu.org.
>
> ---
> ChangeLog |4
> lib/git-merge-changelog.c |2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1
On 03/16/2012 12:08 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> * lib/git-merge-changelog.c: Add example on how to use in .hgrc.
> ---
> ChangeLog |5 +
> lib/git-merge-changelog.c | 10 +-
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ChangeLog b/Cha
A slight simplification:
>From 4ab7998acbf4f829fdecabd83dc75beedcdffea1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Reuben Thomas
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:37:21 +
Subject: [PATCH] README-release: simplify slightly
* top/README-release: only run "git checkout master" once.
---
ChangeLog |5
14 matches
Mail list logo
