On 11/28/11 15:39, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Do you know of any platforms where sizeof (ptrdiff_t) < sizeof (void *) ?
The standard operating mode for ILE C/C++ (for IBM i)
has 16-byte pointers; I expect that sizeof (ptrdiff_t)
is 8 and sizeof (void *) is 16 on such platforms, though
I don't have a sh
On 11/28/2011 04:39 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
>> e->short_options += (short_options - hol->short_options);
>>
>> subtracts two pointers that do not point to the same memory object.
>> Something like:
>>
>> e->short_options = short_options + (e->short_options - hol->short_options);
>>
Hi Matthew,
> e->short_options += (short_options - hol->short_options);
>
> subtracts two pointers that do not point to the same memory object.
> Something like:
>
> e->short_options = short_options + (e->short_options - hol->short_options);
>
> does the intended operation with legal pointer ar
Hi:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Matthew Wala wrote:
> Hello:
>
> The function hol_append() in lib/argp-parse.c exhibits undefined behavior.
> Specifically, the expression in line 894:
>
Sorry, I meant lib/argp-help.c
Matt
On 11/28/2011 12:18 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> That is, any objections to moving this out of coreutil's cfg.mk and into
>> gnulib's maint.mk?
>
> I was reluctant to do that because "compare" is a pretty common word,
> and I didn't try to limit the rule to a particular (tests/) directory.
> If it w
Hello:
The function hol_append() in lib/argp-parse.c exhibits undefined behavior.
Specifically, the expression in line 894:
e->short_options += (short_options - hol->short_options);
subtracts two pointers that do not point to the same memory object.
Something like:
e->short_options = short_opti
Eric Blake wrote:
> [adding bug-gnulib]
>
> On 11/27/2011 01:17 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Someone should have dinged me ;-)
>> Last week I made a global change but forgot to add a matching
>> syntax-check rule.
>>
>>>From 5b3e538b7fc193f8e54b16aeb99b48f28744c1db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: J
[adding bug-gnulib]
On 11/27/2011 01:17 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Someone should have dinged me ;-)
> Last week I made a global change but forgot to add a matching
> syntax-check rule.
>
>>From 5b3e538b7fc193f8e54b16aeb99b48f28744c1db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering
> Date: Sun, 27
On 11/25/2011 04:24 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
If gnulib would give
us posix_memalign on mingw, we could nuke this #if altogether.
>>>
>>> That's pretty difficult (unless you also add a posix_memalign_free)
>>> because at the time posix_memalign returns you have lost the
I noticed that I'd missed a function, proper_name,
marked it as _GL_ATTRIBUTE_CONST, and then realized that
it must not be marked with that attribute, since not only
is it not "pure", but it is not "const" either.
>From b6656e88f137483b7407053679870618af180de7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Me
On 11/26/2011 02:14 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
Malloc page than realloc to smaller does not work ?
There is no constraint that realloc(X, N) returns X, even if N is
smaller than the previous allocation size.
Paolo
11 matches
Mail list logo
