On 26 February 2011 16:44, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 26 February 2011 16:40, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>> This is correct. However, there is no advice printed to create the
>> directory lib/. The two lines of advice that no longer apply are:
>>
>> [Don't forget to]
>> - add "lib/Makefile" to AC_CONFI
On 26 February 2011 16:40, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> This is correct. However, there is no advice printed to create the
> directory lib/. The two lines of advice that no longer apply are:
>
> [Don't forget to]
> - add "lib/Makefile" to AC_CONFIG_FILES in ./configure.ac,
> - mention "lib" in SUBDIRS
On 26 February 2011 02:21, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Reuben Thomas wrote:
>> I have an autotools project with no C in. I still want to use gnulib's
>> maintainer-makefile module, but I don't want to use C. If I leave
>> "lib" in the top-level SUBDIRS, then I'm forced to us AC_PROG_CC, or C
>> source i
Hi Jan,
More comments on your mail yesterday:
About [PATCH 1/3] tests: Allow GL_RM_RF-macro as a fallback for rm:
> > (as Bruno pointed out earlier, the easiest ways to test for mingw
> > are msys or cygwin cross-compilation, but it is possible to have
> > rm.exe even without those environments)
