On Saturday, February 19, 2011 14:49:32 Jim Meyering wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> further, some of the commands used in git-version-gen require write
> >> access to the .git repo (i.e. git update-index --refresh), which our
> >> package management tools flag as a viol
the current git-version-gen script and its usage in packages such as coreutils
is causing me headaches wrt distros. it currently assumes one of two states:
- the current tree is a valid git repo belonging to the related project
- the current tree is not a git repo (all the way bac
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
>> Would you mind if I adjust whichever of the 25 in tests/ that are yours ?
>
> Yes, I do mind changing 160 lines of code in just one file because of this.
>
> My point is that 'cppi' wants to enforce a coding style that is pretty far
> away from the current, reaso
