Re: done digging around test-dprintf-posix2

2011-01-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Bruce Korb wrote: > I had previously looked at the maps file, but must have made > a typo in counting up the spaces.  This time, I got the full 10 meg. Can you please show this maps file, verbatim? Bruno

Re: done digging around test-dprintf-posix2

2011-01-10 Thread Bruce Korb
On 01/10/11 12:44, Bruno Haible wrote: > The core file is not necessarily an entirely faithful image of > the address space of the running process. That is, indeed, the cause of my confusion. "size core" shows allocated space, but not shared library space for libraries that weren't really used.

Re: recutils uses gnulib

2011-01-10 Thread Jose E. Marchesi
Just adding a note that recutils now uses a number of gnulib modules (see ): Great! :D

Re: test-dprintf-posix2 failure (was: How about this patch)

2011-01-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Bruce, Please choose a meaningful subject to your mail. How could someone keep track of the 4000 mails that come in through bug-gnulib if many subjects were "How about this patch", "Second attempt", "Help", and "I've got it"? > + /* This "dprintf" can draw in a number of libraries trigger

Re: done digging around test-dprintf-posix2

2011-01-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Bruce Korb wrote: > 1. 4MB pages -- don't know, but I doubt it. This is an out-of-the-box >openSuSE 11.3 installation for x86-64. OK, then it's likely the standard 4 KB page size. > 2. I do not think I need those sizes, since I have a core image. >That core image is just under 300K. The

Re: libposix versioning

2011-01-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Bruno, * Bruno Haible wrote on Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 09:30:17PM CET: > 2) We might remove some workarounds from gnulib, thinking that don't > affect recent systems any more. (We sometimes do this for Cygwin, > on the premise that Cygwin users update at least once every 2 years.) > >

libposix versioning

2011-01-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Gary, Bruce, In you proposed to use libtool version 0:0:0 for libposix. But there is a problem with that, or with using "small" increments of this version number. A user will want to be able to build a newer version of libpos

How about this patch

2011-01-10 Thread Bruce Korb
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 1aeaaf0..b336137 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,9 +1,10 @@ -2011-01-07 Bruce Korb +2011-01-10 Bruce Korb - tests: exercise malloc a tiny bit before setting the rlimit. - * tests/test-dprintf-posix2.c: the test occasionally fails on Linu

recutils uses gnulib

2011-01-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Just adding a note that recutils now uses a number of gnulib modules (see ): 2011-01-10 Bruno Haible doc: Update users.txt. * users.txt: Add recutils. --- a/users.txt +++ b/users.txt @@ -62,6 +62