On 09/06/2010 11:30 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi Lorenzo,
checking for working GNU getopt function... no
it looks kind of strange that getopt test fails under GNU Linux...
(indeed, this way, the gnulib version of getopt is used, instead of GNU
libc version)
If you want to know why: The fixes
Hi Lorenzo,
> checking for working GNU getopt function... no
>
> it looks kind of strange that getopt test fails under GNU Linux...
>
> (indeed, this way, the gnulib version of getopt is used, instead of GNU
> libc version)
If you want to know why: The fixes that each gnulib module brings are
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Lorenzo Bettini
wrote:
> (indeed, this way, the gnulib version of getopt is used, instead of GNU libc
> version)
Is this related to the getopt bug I reported earlier?
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
Hi
I've just updated gnulib and updated my modules (strdup and getopt) and
I see that now configure says in Linux
checking getopt.h usability... yes
checking getopt.h presence... yes
checking for getopt.h... yes
checking for stddef.h... (cached) yes
checking for string.h... (cached) yes
checki
On Sunday 05 September 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello,
>
> * Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 07:28:58PM CEST:
> > Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > > What about instead making the names of the temporaries
> > > source/build/install directories used by "make distcheck"
> > > configurabl
On 08/29/10 14:39, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
>> However, HAVE_SELINUX_SELINUX_H *is* defined in config.h.
>>
>> That is due to the use of
>> gl_CHECK_NEXT_HEADERS([selinux/selinux.h]) in selinux-selinux.m4,
>> which ends up invoking AC_CHECK_HEADERS_ONCE([selinux/sel
[[sorry for the thread hijack]]
On 6 Sep 2010, at 03:44, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:23:57PM CEST:
>> The git pages are clear that S-O-B has project-dependent
>> interpretation. Coreutils currently doesn't even use it (the only
>> people with commit priv
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On 6 Sep 2010, at 12:47, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 05:20:30AM CEST:
>>> On 6 Sep 2010, at 03:44, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Except that the autotools project logs contain lots of S-O-B entries
which explicitly do not hav
On 6 Sep 2010, at 12:47, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 05:20:30AM CEST:
>> On 6 Sep 2010, at 03:44, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> Except that the autotools project logs contain lots of S-O-B entries
>>> which explicitly do not have that particular meaning. :
