Re: bug#6331: [sshfs] df reports wrong disk space usage on solaris

2010-06-15 Thread Jim Meyering
Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Thu, 03 Jun 2010, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> Hmm, actually "struct statfs" on linux does have f_frsize, only the >> manpage doesn't document it. So correct thing would be to use that, >> no? > > Here's a patch that allows df(1) to correctly calculate the disk usage > and d

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: fix detection under mingw

2010-06-15 Thread Eric Blake
On 06/15/2010 08:56 AM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > Hello, > > this small patch fixes the detection of IPv6 under mingw. The header > is already used by . > > Cheers, > Giuseppe > >>From f07f37a7ec475a1eab35a329ee528c0d24c70ae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Giuseppe Scrivano > Date: Tue, 15

Re: AC_FUNC_STRTOD

2010-06-15 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 06/14/2010 09:56 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: At this point, it would be a good idea to mark all AC_FUNC_* macros that request an AC_LIBOBJ replacement as obsolete and refer the user to Gnulib for both the macro and the workaround code (and the documentation). Except maybe AC_FUNC_MALLOC and AC_FUN

Re: [PATCH] bypass broken inline strtod() definition in on Mingw

2010-06-15 Thread Ben Pfaff
Bruno Haible writes: >> Here is #2. >> Here is #3: > > Perfect. Please push (after rebasing). Thanks. Done. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org

[PATCH] ipv6: fix detection under mingw

2010-06-15 Thread Giuseppe Scrivano
Hello, this small patch fixes the detection of IPv6 under mingw. The header is already used by . Cheers, Giuseppe >From f07f37a7ec475a1eab35a329ee528c0d24c70ae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Giuseppe Scrivano Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:45:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ipv6: fix detection under mi

Re: [PATCH] bypass broken inline strtod() definition in on Mingw

2010-06-15 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Ben, > Here is #2. > Here is #3: Perfect. Please push (after rebasing). Bruno

Re: Bug in select() under Mingw32

2010-06-15 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, René Berber wrote: > wait_timeout = timeout->tv_sec + timeout->tv_usec / 1000; > > --- last line should be: > > wait_timeout = timeout->tv_sec * 1000 + timeout->tv_usec / 1000; Thanks! Your patch is obviously correct. I've committed it in your name. Bruno