> Failures on Cygwin 1.7.2
>
>
> test-mbsnrtowcs.c:181: assertion failed
> ./test-mbsnrtowcs2.sh: line 15: 5708 Aborted (core dumped)
> LC_ALL=$LOCALE_FR_UTF8 ./test-mbsnrtowcs${EXEEXT} 2
> FAIL: test-mbsnrtowcs2.sh
>
> test-mbsrtowcs.c:181: assertion fa
> Failures on Cygwin 1.7.2
>
>
> test-btowc.c:48: assertion failed
> ./test-btowc1.sh: line 15: 2892 Aborted (core dumped)
> LC_ALL=$LOCALE_FR ./test-btowc${EXEEXT} 1
> FAIL: test-btowc1.sh
>
> test-btowc.c:56: assertion failed
> ./test-btowc2.sh: line 1
At 0:15 Uhr +0100 5.4.2010, Bruno Haible wrote:
>I'm applying this patch.
Thanks a lot!
hauke
--
"It's never straight up and down" (DEVO)
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/-10/-28163 12:59 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Is the 'printf' command portable enough to be used in configure files
and autoconf macros?
The GNU Coding Standards [1] don't mention it as a portable utility. Indeed,
when you use bash version 1 (which does n
> Failures on Cygwin 1.7.2
>
>
> Starting test_cond .../bin/sh: line 5: 4200 Aborted
> FAIL: test-cond.exe
>
> Starting test_lock .../bin/sh: line 5: 2296 Aborted
> FAIL: test-lock.exe
>
> Starting test_tls .../bin/sh: line 5: 2656 Aborted
> FAIL: test-tls.exe
These
On 04/05/2010 03:08 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> This could be an argument for wrapping some of the C-only tests in a
>> simple init.sh-using driver (maybe even automatically). Any test that
>> creates a temporary file would benefit.
>
> Yes, I agree: It would make things simp
On 04/05/2010 02:56 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
> And also the write flavors of popen: popen(xx,O_BINARY?"wb":"w")
>
> I have to say, though, the "I know what you want, but I won't
> do it because you didn't ask for "r" mode the way I want you to"
> error messages are the bain of one's programming exis
Jim Meyering wrote:
> This could be an argument for wrapping some of the C-only tests in a
> simple init.sh-using driver (maybe even automatically). Any test that
> creates a temporary file would benefit.
Yes, I agree: It would make things simpler and more robust if all tests
that require tempora
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
My philosophy is slightly different. I prefer to go with whatever it is
that makes life easier for programming to multiple platforms.
>>>
>>> http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11312
>>
>> Unfortunately, Uli rejected it
On 5-04-10 18:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry din't forward to all...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Elbert Pol
Date: Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 17:59
Subject: Re: Os2
To: Paolo Bonzini
On 5-04-10 10:13, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 04/04/2010 09:49 PM, Elbert Pol wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Eric Blake on 2/22/2010 4:29 PM:
>> According to Bruce Korb on 2/22/2010 3:50 PM:
The question, though, is whether cygwin's extension is useful enough to
push on all platforms. Gnulib tends to favor glibc extensions rather than
cygwin extensions. In
On 01/-10/-28163 12:59 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Is the 'printf' command portable enough to be used in configure files
> and autoconf macros?
>
> The GNU Coding Standards [1] don't mention it as a portable utility. Indeed,
> when you use bash version 1 (which does not have 'printf' built-in) on a
According to Eric Blake on 2/22/2010 4:29 PM:
> According to Bruce Korb on 2/22/2010 3:50 PM:
>>> The question, though, is whether cygwin's extension is useful enough to
>>> push on all platforms. Gnulib tends to favor glibc extensions rather than
>>> cygwin extensions. In other words, it is hard
This test failure was seen on Solaris 8/SPARC:
> FAIL: test-u8-strncat
Since u8_strncat is just a wrapper around strncat, this indicates a bug
in the system's strncat function. In fact, strncat(dest,src,n) appears to
always access at least n+1 bytes starting at src, when src[0..n-1] don't
contain
Bruno Haible wrote:
>> I had already converted tests/test-xstrtol.sh.
>> This continues the process with the other test-xstrto*.sh scripts
>
> What are, in summary, the benefits of init.sh? I'm wondering whether
> we might be putting in features here that are not available tests
> written entirely
Hi Jim,
> I had already converted tests/test-xstrtol.sh.
> This continues the process with the other test-xstrto*.sh scripts
What are, in summary, the benefits of init.sh? I'm wondering whether
we might be putting in features here that are not available tests
written entirely in C.
As far as I c
I had already converted tests/test-xstrtol.sh.
This continues the process with the other test-xstrto*.sh scripts
as well as the atexit tests, even though that module is marked as
obsolete.
>From 5c92acef552620a440dc134faf6d1f7fd14f825f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Mon, 5 Apr
> 2010-03-28 Bruno Haible
>
> unistd: Avoid #define replacements in C++ mode.
> * lib/unistd.in.h (socket, connect, accept, bind, getpeername,
> getsockname, getsockopt, listen, recv, send, recvfrom, sendto,
> setsockopt, shutdown, select): In C++, attach a warning to th
> ../gllib/stdio.h:632: error: `fseeko' was not declared in this scope
>
> This should fix it.
This did not fix it completely, because m4/fflush.m4 also fiddles with
REPLACE_FSEEKO. This fixes it, now.
2010-04-05 Bruno Haible
fseeko: Fix C++ test error on mingw.
* m4/fseek
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are the test results of a complete gnulib testdir on Solaris 8,
> compiled once with gcc, once with cc.
>
>
> Failures
>
>
> test-flock.c:62: assertion failed
> FAIL: test-flock
>
> Unconnected socket test... passed
> Connected sockets test... failed (ex
Here are the test results of a complete gnulib testdir on Cygwin.
Failures on both Cygwin 1.5.25 and 1.7.2
file_has_acl("tmpdir0") returned yes, expected no
FAIL: test-file-has-acl.sh
Unconnected socket test... passed
Connected sockets test... passed
Gene
Hi,
Here are the test results of a complete gnulib testdir on Solaris 8,
compiled once with gcc, once with cc.
Failures
test-flock.c:62: assertion failed
FAIL: test-flock
Unconnected socket test... passed
Connected sockets test... failed (expecting POLLHUP after shutdown)
General sock
On 04/05/2010 08:56 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
>>> - QueryPerformanceCounter [1] has a resolution of 0.5 ms or higher.
>>
>> ... if you use it, then you run into the issues of file timestamp mismatch
>> (cygwin currently has a known issue where, because it uses
>> QueryPerformanceCount
Eric Blake wrote:
> I see no reason to remove years that were added during a global year update.
Listing the years individually gave at least a certain idea about whether a
file is "active", i.e. heavily used and maintained, or on the bitrot slope.
Well, you can also see that by peeking into the g
Eric Blake wrote:
> I'm okay with removing it; if someone complains, we have version control
> to allow us to resuscitate it at that time.
Done.
Bruno
Hi Eric,
> > - QueryPerformanceCounter [1] has a resolution of 0.5 ms or higher.
>
> ... if you use it, then you run into the issues of file timestamp mismatch
> (cygwin currently has a known issue where, because it uses
> QueryPerformanceCounter instead of GetSystemTimeAsFileTime for
> impleme
On 04/05/2010 08:43 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>>> - Copyright (C) 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>> + Copyright (C) 2008, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>
>> Oops. You meant "2008-2010", not "2008, 2010".
>
> No, the file's contents was not modified i
Eric Blake wrote:
> > - Copyright (C) 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > + Copyright (C) 2008, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> Oops. You meant "2008-2010", not "2008, 2010".
No, the file's contents was not modified in 2009.
Bruno
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/04/2010 09:10 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The rmdir module does not satisfy the common idiom (distinguish
>> missing and broken function). But this part is already marked as
>> "simplify this module in 2010 if no one reports a missing rmdir"
>>
>> Did someone re
On 04/04/2010 09:10 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The rmdir module does not satisfy the common idiom (distinguish
> missing and broken function). But this part is already marked as
> "simplify this module in 2010 if no one reports a missing rmdir"
>
> Did someone report a missing rmdir? Or
On 04/04/2010 04:41 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a side note about how to measure elapsed time on mingw.
> (I needed this in order to evaluate how to implement nanosleep on mingw.)
>
> Summary:
> - GetSystemTimeAsFileTime, _ftime, gettimeofday (from newer mingw runtimes)
> all hav
Annoying to have missed this...
>From 50e8c42eba9bd52548e0de3fec113ab2ea1e0f4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:10:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] init.sh: fix typo
* tests/init.sh: Restore omitted ":" before stderr_fileno_ initialization.
---
ChangeLog |3
On Solaris 8, I'm seeing this error:
In file included from test-unistd-c++.cc:22:
../gllib/unistd.h:750: error: 'fchownat' was not declared in this scope
The problem is that REPLACE_FCHOWNAT is set to 1 although HAVE_FCHOWNAT is
already set to 0.
Here is a proposed fix. Jim, is this OK to co
On 04/04/2010 05:39 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> +++ lib/btowc.c Mon Apr 5 01:27:46 2010
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /* Convert unibyte character to wide character.
> - Copyright (C) 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> + Copyright (C) 2008, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Oops.
> ../gllib/math.h:620: error: 'frexpl' was not declared in this scope
>
> Again, the problem is that REPLACE_FREXPL is set when the function does
> not exist. This fixes it.
Oops, it did not fix it, because gl_FUNC_FREXPL_NO_LIBM can still set
REPLACE_FREXPL=1 when the function exists. I'm appl
[adding bug-gnulib]
On 04/03/2010 03:48 PM, Elbert Pol wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I tried today to port it to OS2
> I used Gcc 4.4.2 and the make fails here:
>
> In file included from fnmatch.c:175:
> fnmatch_loop.c: In function 'internal_fnmatch':
> fnmatch_loop.c:53: error: 'FNM_EXTMATCH' undecla
The 'vasprintf' module provides not only the vasprintf, but also the asprintf
function. But the doc does not mention it. This fixes it:
2010-04-05 Bruno Haible
vasprintf: Update documentation.
* doc/glibc-functions/asprintf.texi: Mention the 'vasprintf' module.
--- doc/glibc-
Also the function memchr could lead to a C++ test error, on those old platforms
where it is missing. This should fix it.
2010-04-05 Bruno Haible
memchr: Avoid a possible C++ test error.
* lib/string.in.h (memchr): Provide declaration if function is missing.
* m4/memchr
This tiny improvement should have no visible effect either.
2010-04-05 Bruno Haible
strtok_r: Improve idiom.
* m4/strtok_r.m4 (gl_FUNC_STRTOK_R): Invoke gl_PREREQ_STRDUP only when
AC_LIBOBJ is used.
--- m4/strtok_r.m4.orig Mon Apr 5 12:53:07 2010
+++ m4/strtok_r.m4
This improves the idiom used in strdup.m4. It should have no effect on any
platform, since all platforms which lack strdup are UNIX platforms, i.e. have
a POSIX compliant malloc.
2010-04-05 Bruno Haible
strdup: Improve idiom.
* m4/strdup.m4 (gl_FUNC_STRDUP): Invoke gl_PREREQ_S
A similar problem with the idiom coulds also lead to a C++ mode link error
with the functions mbsinit, mbrtowc, wcrtomb, etc. This improves it:
2010-04-05 Bruno Haible
mbsinit, mbrtowc, wcrtomb: Improve idioms.
* m4/mbsinit.m4 (gl_FUNC_MBSINIT): When the function does not exis
Likewise for ldexpl, although the use of a dangerous idiom did not lead to
a test compilation error on Solaris 8 and Cygwin this time.
2010-04-05 Bruno Haible
ldexpl: Improve idiom.
* m4/ldexpl.m4 (gl_FUNC_LDEXPL): When the function is not declared,
make sure to set HA
FYI,
>From b8b72c1b316e0db012f9d2e2dc6b7028bd5e96c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 10:01:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] init.sh: make it easier for a test script to write to the tty,
...
when using automake's parallel-tests mode.
* tests/init.sh (stderr_fileno_): D
43 matches
Mail list logo
