On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> The lib/stat-time.h file in gnulib to which you contributed on 2007-03-27
> is under GPL. Guile would like to use it (see attached mail), but Guile is
> LGPL. Can you agree to relicensing this file under LGPL? Paul Eggert has
>
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Paul and James,
>
> The lib/stat-time.h file that you contributed to gnulib is under GPL.
> Guile would like to use it (see attached mail), but Guile is LGPL. Can you
> agree to relicensing this file under LGPL?
Of course.
James.
Hi David,
David Lutterkort wrote:
> Can the licenses for nl_langinfo and langinfo be switched to LGPLv2+ ?
As the author of both modules, I have no problem with that.
> modules/langinfo|2 +-
> modules/nl_langinfo |2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff -
* Bruno Haible wrote on Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:18:06AM CET:
> > 2010-01-17 Bruno Haible
> >
> > Avoid compilation error with cc on OSF/1 5.1.
> > * lib/fcntl.in.h: Include after the #include_next
> > statement, not before.
> > Reported by Ralf Wildenhues.
>
> There were no o
Since commit 0cfc3b87, the regex module depends on nl_langinfo.
Unfortunately, regex is LGPLv2+ and nl_langinfo is LGPL. Can the
licenses for nl_langinfo and langinfo be switched to LGPLv2+ ?
This lets me use regex again from LGPLv2+:
> From b54f93bba737f2802aa46aa7110bd6c0e88242e0 Mon Sep 17 00:
> 2010-01-17 Bruno Haible
>
> Avoid compilation error with cc on OSF/1 5.1.
> * lib/fcntl.in.h: Include after the #include_next
> statement, not before.
> Reported by Ralf Wildenhues.
There were no objections. So I applied this.
Bruno
I oppose this. This causes -lm -lm -lm -lm -lm to appear in the link
lines, which is not aesthetic, and causes quite some bloat in
configure scripts size and execution time.
Is there a function that is never provided in libc unless all of them
are provided in libc? If so, I'd say that a simple A
