-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Eric Blake on 12/1/2009 9:59 AM:
> I just filed a couple of glibc bugs against getopt; depending on the reaction
> I
> get from the glibc folks, I may need to update gnulib's getopt accordingly.
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/sh
Eric Blake wrote:
> Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes:
>> BTW, I just saw this go by while testing on freebsd8:
>>
>> ...
>> Abort trap (core dumped)
>> FAIL: test-getopt
>
> Which line number? Or better yet, a full backtrace, since test-getopt calls
> some lines in a loop.
Maybe a f
Sergey Poznyakoff gnu.org.ua> writes:
> > Argp doesn't protect the user from picking short options that
> > interfere with argp's getopt implementation.
>
> Thanks for reporting and for the patch. I'll apply it.
argp should also protect against ';', since "W;" is special to getopt.
--
Eric Bl
Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes:
> BTW, I just saw this go by while testing on freebsd8:
>
> ...
> Abort trap (core dumped)
> FAIL: test-getopt
Which line number? Or better yet, a full backtrace, since test-getopt calls
some lines in a loop.
Right now, getopt.m4 only filters ou
I just filed a couple of glibc bugs against getopt; depending on the reaction I
get from the glibc folks, I may need to update gnulib's getopt accordingly.
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11039
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11040
At any rate, our unit test
Eric Blake wrote:
> Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes:
>> FYI, building latest coreutils on Solaris 10,
>> I get this failure:
>>
>> CCLD sort
>> Undefined first referenced
>>symbol in file
>> nanosleep ../
Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes:
>
> FYI, building latest coreutils on Solaris 10,
> I get this failure:
>
> CCLD sort
> Undefined first referenced
>symbol in file
> nanosleep ../lib/libcoreutils.a(xna
FYI, building latest coreutils on Solaris 10,
I get this failure:
CCLD sort
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
nanosleep ../lib/libcoreutils.a(xnanosleep.o)
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Ladislav Hagara wrote:
>> the behaviour of rm from last stable coreutils 8.1 is quite different
>> from previous 7.6 one.
>
>> Is this a bug or a new feature of rm 8.1?
>
> Thank you very much for the report!
> That is most definitely a bug.
>
> The fix has two parts:
...
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Ladislav Hagara wrote:
>> the behaviour of rm from last stable coreutils 8.1 is quite different
>> from previous 7.6 one.
>
>> Is this a bug or a new feature of rm 8.1?
>
> Thank you very much for the report!
> That is most definitely a bug.
>
> The fix has two parts:
>
>
Ladislav Hagara wrote:
> the behaviour of rm from last stable coreutils 8.1 is quite different
> from previous 7.6 one.
> Is this a bug or a new feature of rm 8.1?
Thank you very much for the report!
That is most definitely a bug.
The fix has two parts:
in gnulib:
The fts_open function
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Jim Meyering writes:
>
>> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> ...
>>> Unfortunately I was never able to get anyone at Red Hat to sign a
>>> copyright assignment license for me for gnulib, or to get the FSF to
>>> agree that I didn't need one because I work for Red Hat.
>>
>> Tha
12 matches
Mail list logo
