Re: solaris 9: undefined symbol rpl_open

2009-11-08 Thread Thomas Guyot-Sionnest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 27/10/09 10:13 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > Thomas Guyot-Sionnest aei.ca> writes: > >> # Reproduce by: gnulib-tool --import --dir=. --lib=libgnu >> --source-base=gl --m4-base=gl/m4 --doc-base=doc --tests-base=tests >> --aux-dir=build-aux --no-libtool -

Re: [PATCH] modules/strftime (Depends-on): Add ignore-value.

2009-11-08 Thread James Youngman
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > James Youngman wrote: >> The attached patch simply makes the strftime module depend on >> ignore-value, since lib/strftime.c includes "ignore-value.h". > > Hi James, > > Thanks for the patch, but as far as I can tell it's not needed, > since th

Re: need opendir_safer, dirent--.h

2009-11-08 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to James Youngman on 11/8/2009 2:59 PM: >> Here's the preliminary patch series, to be applied on top of my >> fchdir/fdopendir series. However, since we are also lacking openat_safer, it >> looks like fts will STILL pollute the standard fds.

Re: need opendir_safer, dirent--.h

2009-11-08 Thread James Youngman
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > Eric Blake byu.net> writes: > >> > I think we need to implement opendir_safer, alongside all the other >> > *_safer modules.  Otherwise, opendir can end up placing an open directory >> > fd in one of the standard slots, and end up interfering wi

Re: [PATCH] modules/strftime (Depends-on): Add ignore-value.

2009-11-08 Thread Jim Meyering
James Youngman wrote: > The attached patch simply makes the strftime module depend on > ignore-value, since lib/strftime.c includes "ignore-value.h". Hi James, Thanks for the patch, but as far as I can tell it's not needed, since the only uses are protected by "#if FPRINTFTIME". The fprintftime m

[PATCH] modules/strftime (Depends-on): Add ignore-value.

2009-11-08 Thread James Youngman
The attached patch simply makes the strftime module depend on ignore-value, since lib/strftime.c includes "ignore-value.h". From 3f89bf8a271833d1f854d427db3df928915d9d82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Youngman Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:17:09 + Subject: [PATCH] modules/strftime (Depends-on

Re: [PATCH] admin: automate one more part of the release process

2009-11-08 Thread Thiago Farina
Hi Jim, On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> FYI, I've just pushed this to coreutils, so that the following >> from README-release is no longer manual: >> >>  * Manually set the date, version number, and [stable/alpha/beta] on >>    line 3 of NEWS, then do

[PATCH] utimens: remove invalid futimesat call

2009-11-08 Thread Jim Meyering
This fixes coreutils' final FreeBSD-8.0-rc2 test failure: >From 26c5fd742f9136e2ddbd4695a9172c3fa30ea260 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:09:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] utimens: remove invalid futimesat call * lib/utimens.c (fdutimens) [HAVE_FUTIMESAT]: Remove i

Re: [PATCH] admin: automate one more part of the release process

2009-11-08 Thread Jim Meyering
Thiago Farina wrote: ... >>>     build-aux/do-release-commit-and-tag 8.1 beta >> No one objected, so I've moved it to gnulib as-is. > > I noticed that there is a build-aux in coreutils tree, but since there > is no do-release-commit-and-tag in there, I think it could be like > this: > > diff --git