Re: [PATCH] admin: automate one more part of the release process

Jim Meyering wrote: > FYI, I've just pushed this to coreutils, so that the following > from README-release is no longer manual: > > * Manually set the date, version number, and [stable/alpha/beta] on >line 3 of NEWS, then do e.g.,: > > v=8.0 > pkg=$(sed -n 's/^PACKAGE = \(.*\)/\1/p' Ma

Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt

On 11/06/2009 10:24 AM, Ben Asselstine wrote: I hope this trivial patch can be applied without the need for copyright assignment. I cannot judge the patch since I'm not familiar with argp, but anyway the answer to this question should be yes. Paolo

argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt

Hi folks, Argp doesn't protect the user from picking short options that interfere with argp's getopt implementation. I apologize in advance for any line-splitting that gmail does to this message. Consider the options in the following program: $ ./bug1 --help Usage: bug1 [OPTION...] -+, --plu

Re: Problem with linking when compiling GNUTLS

Dagobert Michelsen writes: >> /opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. - >> I../.. -I. -I. -I../.. -I./../.. -I../../gl -I./../../gl >> -I/opt/csw/ >> include -xO3 -xarch=v8 -I/opt/csw/include -c test-select.c >> /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --preserve-dup-deps --mode=