Eric Blake writes:
> Simon Josefsson josefsson.org> writes:
>
>> > Wouldn't it be nicer to rewrite the getaddrinfo.m4 to guarantee that
>> > $(GETADDRINFO_LIB) contains the contents of $(INET_NTOP_LIB), so that
>> > there is only one link line?
>>
>> Hm, good point. How about this?
>
> Yes, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Leo Davis on 11/5/2009 2:27 PM:
> Hello,
>
> I tried building GNU m4 1.4.13 on a MacBook running Snow Leopard (10.6.1
> Intel).
> I have Xcode 3.2.1 installed (gcc is i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC)
> 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646) (do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Eric Blake on 11/5/2009 10:43 AM:
> $ cat foo.c
> #include
> int main()
> {
> if (stderr != freopen("/dev/null","w",stderr))
> return 5;
> return fileno(stderr);
> }
> $ ./foo && echo $?
> 2
> $ ./foo <&- && echo $?
> 0
> $ ./foo
Hello,
Erik Auerswald writes:
> Why have an option for the default operation at all? If --available is
> the same as specifying no option and the only other mode of operation is
> --all, only the --all option should be recognised. There is no need for
> --available.
it is not very common case b
Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
> This should definitely be fixed for clients of the stdio-safer module (and
its
> corresponding "stdio--.h") - if we ever violate the premise that
> STDERR_FILENO==fileno(stderr), then the whole point of the *_safer functions
is
> lost.
Here's what I will probab
Hi Pádraig,
Pádraig Brady writes:
> Well --available and --all are mutually exclusive and related.
> That fact is obvious if they're parameters to a single option.
> But I do take your point that --count is a bit redundant,
> and I don't see nproc getting many other options, so OK
> leave them a
