Hello-
If I use visibility.m4 on a platform with a recent GCC (4.x) on
Cygwin, the visibility.m4 correctly discovers that gcc can compile with
-fvisibility="hidden". But, on Cygwin (and probably most non-ELF) gcc does
not actualy implement the visibility and emits the warning "visibility
attr
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > + while (*envvalue != '\0' && c_isspace (*envvalue))
> > + envvalue++;
>
> A pedantic comment. Could one instead assume strtoul() skips leading
> whitespace?
But then strtoul would also skip a sign, and a value of, say, "+4" is not
allowed by the OpenMP spec.
Bruno Haible wrote:
>
> Here is a proposed change to the gnulib 'nproc' module. It will
> require changes (simplification) on Giuseppe's side, of course.
Wow, this is great stuff Bruno, thanks!
> *** lib/nproc.c.orig 2009-11-01 14:55:37.0 +0100
> --- lib/nproc.c 2009-11-01 14:54:5
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> num_processors() already uses _NPROCESSORS_ONLN (online processors)
> so I then wondered how this be different to that returned by
> pthread_getaffinity_np() ?
>
> A quick google for cpuset shows:
> http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man7/cpuset.7.html
>
> Als
Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> Hi Pádraig,
>
>
> Pádraig Brady writes:
>
>> I do wonder though whether it would be better
>> to have num_processors() try to return this by default?
>
> num_processors is going to be used by programs as nproc will be used by
> scripts; all considerations we made for
