Albert Chin wrote:
> > Something like this. Probably also adding replacements for btowc and
> > mbrtowc.
> >
> > [ snip snip ]
>
> Any plans to commit the patch?
It's still in the works. I decided to go for btowc and mbrtowc substitutes and
drop
the "something like this" part (since there is no
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 17:02:51 Eric Blake wrote:
> POSIX 2008 is now freely available at:
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/bookstore/catalog/c082.htm
>
> which, once you accept a cookie, redirects to:
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/toc.htm
wonder if the canonical link will be
POSIX 2008 is now freely available at:
http://www.opengroup.org/bookstore/catalog/c082.htm
which, once you accept a cookie, redirects to:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/toc.htm
[My favorite page - the new examples section for touch(1):
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/969991
Hello,
Using Simons daily-build script I got this failure:
depbase=`echo flock.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.o$||'`;\
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DEXEEXT=\"\" -DEXEEXT=\"\" -DNO_XMALLOC
-DEXEEXT=\"\" -I. -I.. -I../intl -D_REENTRANT -g -O2 -MT flock.o -MD -MP -MF
$depbase.Tpo -c -o
Hi Bruce, Bruno,
* Bruce Korb wrote on Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 05:09:38PM CET:
> Obvious enough you needn't have waited for me. :)
> "Yes, please."
* Bruno Haible wrote on Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 12:47:50PM CET:
>
> This also requires an update of the module dependencies.
Thanks to both of you, push
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 08:24:09AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Maybe you could disable C99 in the gnulib directory?
I remember doing so a while ago and getting detection errors. It's
commented out in my Makefile.am ;)
--
Sylvain
Hi Jim,
* Jim Meyering wrote on Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 08:35:14AM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK to apply? Or would you rather have the $(srcdir)/ in $(ME)?
> That's fine by me, modulo the long line. How about splitting it?
Split, and pushed.
Thanks!
Ralf
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:42:48PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hello Sergey,
>
> > > This renders compilation of 4.13 inoperable on these systems, and
> > > you get the build errors below
> > >
> > > display.o:display.o:(.text+0x786): undefined reference to `mbrtowc'
> > > display.o:display.
Hi Ralf,
Obvious enough you needn't have waited for me. :)
"Yes, please."
Cheers - Bruce
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Bruce,
>
> ok to commit? Seems pretty obvious.
>
> Thanks,
> Ralf
>
>Add missing include to parse-duration.c.
>
>*
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch should make the test fail. Committed.
It seems to work fine, thanks.
/Simon
http://autobuild.josefsson.org/gnulib/log-200812090924334467000.txt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 12/8/2008 4:07 PM:
> Before doing that, I'd like to see the results that Simon, Jim, Eric, and
> others get on reasonably large code bases. My list of warnings to avoid
> is certainly biased. What we document in the manual
Hi Simon,
> The code reads:
>
> x = 1.73205L;
> y = ldexpl (x, 0); ASSERT (y == x);
>
> Printing the values yield:
>
> x 1.732050 y -0.00
Interesting...
> configure:63967: checking whether ldexpl works
> configure:64002: gcc -std=gnu99 -o conftest -g -O2 -I/opt/local/include
> c
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * lib/parse-duration.c: #include "xalloc.h", for xstrdup.
This also requires an update of the module dependencies.
Bruno
Bruno Haible wrote:
>
> The list of warnings that I would disable unconditionally would be:
>
> warnings="$warnings -Wno-sign-compare" # These warnings usually don't
> point to mistakes.
Usually -Wsign-compare warnings don't point to mistakes,
but they can point to non obvious mistakes
(whi
test-flock.c:90: assertion failed, errno = 0
Abort trap
espresso:~/daily/gnulib/dummy-0/gltests jas$
Removing the line with the abort() call gives:
test-flock.c:89: assertion failed, errno = 0
test-flock.c:90: assertion failed, errno = 0
test-flock.c:91: assertion failed, errno = 0
test-flock.c:
espresso:~/daily/gnulib/dummy-0/gltests jas$ ./test-ldexpl
test-ldexpl.c:99: assertion failed
Abort trap
espresso:~/daily/gnulib/dummy-0/gltests jas$
The code reads:
x = 1.73205L;
y = ldexpl (x, 0); ASSERT (y == x);
Printing the values yield:
x 1.732050 y -0.00
I guess the Mac OS
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since I don't know what __signbitl does and whether it is safe to use it,
> I'm simply making the autoconf test sharper:
This works fine. We now have a powerpc daily builder running:
http://autobuild.josefsson.org/gnulib/
If anyone else wants to donat
17 matches
Mail list logo
