Re: next snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-09-08 Thread Tom G. Christensen
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 08:29:44AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Tom G. Christensen on 9/7/2008 4:47 AM: > > I've spent some time staring at m4s c-stack conftest program and a > > similar one from libsigsegv and after some trial and error I've isolated > > a change which will cause the m4

Re: [PATCH] use unlocked io in getdelim

2008-09-08 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson wrote: >> I'd like to see getndelim2 solve this problem: >> >> 1) LGPL license compatibility > > Done. Thanks. >> 2) Portability: getndelim2 uses freadptr and freedseek which appears >>non-portable by design (or?) -- having a getlin

Re: bitrotate

2008-09-08 Thread Simon Josefsson
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That change looks good. Some minor points: > >> +/* Given an unsigned 16-bit argument X, return the value corresponding >> + to rotating the bits N steps to the left. N must be between 1 to >> + 15 inclusive. */ >> +static inline uint16_t >> +rotl16

Re: syntax-check hits on gnulib itself

2008-09-08 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Any objections to this patch? > > Yes, I object. > > Some people/projects prefer implicit conversions over explicit casts (e.g. > Paul, coreutils). Some people/projects prefer explicit casts over implicit > conversions (e.g. me,

Re: [PATCH] df: new option: --total (-c) to produce grand total (in the same way as du)

2008-09-08 Thread Paolo Bonzini
>> I disagree. The & => && change inserts a conditional branch into the control >> flow, with the potential to save a single memory access. I count ca. 2 CPU >> cycles for a memory access and ca. 8 CPU cycles for a conditional jump, >> therefore I would say that the change slows down the program a