Ondřej Vašík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as reported in RH bugzilla #253817
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253817), there is an issue
> with ls -v (and there will be same issue with sort -V soon). Problem is
> with sorting files with extensions or dist-tags (like .tar.gz)
> because
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I too would like to see getndelim2 under LGPL. I just don't think that we
>> > can do it without RMS' blessing.
>>
>> So little of the code in the original 70-line getstr function[*] remains,
>> that while Jan did indeed write that code, that seems to be
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I'd like to see getndelim2 solve this problem:
>
> 1) LGPL license compatibility
Done.
> 2) Portability: getndelim2 uses freadptr and freedseek which appears
>non-portable by design (or?) -- having a getline that can be compiled
>on any C89/POSIX system can be us
Eric Blake wrote:
> > Except that getndelim2 and memchr2 are GPL, while freadptr and freadseek
> > are LGPL (I assume v3+). Would it be okay to change all four to LGPLv2+?
>
> I'm okay with memchr2 being LGPLv2+; it does little more than memchr,
> which is a basic libc function. Since freadptr a
Hi Jim,
> > I too would like to see getndelim2 under LGPL. I just don't think that we
> > can do it without RMS' blessing.
>
> So little of the code in the original 70-line getstr function[*] remains,
> that while Jan did indeed write that code, that seems to be irrelevant,
> now.
I don't agree
