Re: acl: add support for MacOS X 10.5

2008-05-23 Thread Bruno Haible
Jim Meyering wrote: > Looks good. > You're welcome to commit regardless of the acl_trivial > issue mentioned below. Thanks, applied with a tweak (attached below) that should fix a probable breakage on IRIX in the original proposal. > Once you've investigated Solaris ACLs you might want to adjust

Re: acl: add support for MacOS X 10.5

2008-05-23 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here comes the reworked patch for MacOS X 10.5 support in copy_acl, used > by the 'copy-file' module. With it, now the test passes on MacOS X 10.5, > and of course still passes on Linux and FreeBSD. > > The main difficulty here was to realize that in MacOS

Re: acl: add support for OSF/1 5.1

2008-05-23 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's an addendum, also for Tru64. It turns out that the acl_from_text > function wants a comma at the end of the argument string. > > With FreeBSD, IRIX and Tru64 covered, we can remove the #else for > unknown flavors of ACLs: If a new platform comes up,

Re: acl: add support for OSF/1 5.1

2008-05-23 Thread Bruno Haible
Here's an addendum, also for Tru64. It turns out that the acl_from_text function wants a comma at the end of the argument string. With FreeBSD, IRIX and Tru64 covered, we can remove the #else for unknown flavors of ACLs: If a new platform comes up, it will likely be like FreeBSD. Jim, ok to commi