Paul Eggert wrote:
> This particular case is only weak evidence that 'dd' needs to be in
> the list, since the code uses 'dd' only when /dev/urandom is readable,
> and I expect that 'dd' is supported everywhere /dev/urandom is.
On the other hand, can you point out a system which does n
This particular case is only weak evidence that 'dd' needs to be in
the list, since the code uses 'dd' only when /dev/urandom is readable,
and I expect that 'dd' is supported everywhere /dev/urandom is.
So, I'm inclined to do nothing. /dev/urandom is surely less portable
than dd, so t
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Thanks, below is an updated patch.
OK. Are you going to commit that?
> -Portability problems not fixed by Gnulib:
> +Portability problems fixed by Gnulib module @code{getpass-gnu}:
> @itemize
> @item
> -This function is missing on some platforms:
> -mingw, BeOS.
> +The
This module was already presented in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2006-09/msg00055.html
After fixing this issues mentioned by Ben Pfaff and Paul Eggert, I'm moving it
from GNU gettext into gnulib. I'll also update the GNU gettext documentation to
refer to it.
2008-05-18 Bruno H
On 2006-09-07, I replied to Paul Eggert:
> > Second, this code does not look right:
> >
> > > /* See whether the translation contains the original name. */
> > > if (strstr (translation, name) != NULL)
> >
> > Some translations might contain the name accidentally.
> > As an extreme c
Ben Pfaff wrote on 2006-09-06, about the proposed 'propername' module:
> I like the module. But I think that the background and usage
> that you included in your message should be checked in also, so
> that it's clear. I would not, for example, immediately think to
> update the XGETTEXT_OPTIONS v
