Eric Blake wrote:
> > Here's one more module in the "stdio internals" series. freadptr (stream)
> > returns a pointer to the read buffer of stream.
>
> Nice idea - I can already envision using it in M4
Yes, me too ;-) This is what triggered me to create this API.
> > fseek (fp, nl
Bruno Haible clisp.org> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's one more module in the "stdio internals" series. freadptr (stream)
> returns a pointer to the read buffer of stream.
Nice idea - I can already envision using it in M4 (more on that on the m4-
patches list in response to your recent proposed pa
What happens with freadahead() and freadptr() after ungetc?
In theory it is possible that an implementation stores the bytes pushed-back
by ungetc in a location that freadahead() does not see. The implementations
that I tested don't do this, but the API should support this. I can see three
possibl
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> If there are other pre-C99 compilers that use other ways of printing the
> function name, I suppose the module could be extended with those.
According to boost/current_function.hpp, it appears that
- GNU C is not the only compiler to support __PRETTY_FUNCTION__;
Metr
Simon Josefsson josefsson.org> writes:
> The __func__ module will add the block above to config.h, to make sure
> that __func__ is usable.
>
> If there are other pre-C99 compilers that use other ways of printing the
> function name, I suppose the module could be extended with those.
>
> What do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> # define __func__ ""
>
> Some packages use
>#define __func__ __FILE__
> in this case. Not perfect, but still more informative than "".
But, wouldn't one normally include __FILE__ in diagno
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> # define __func__ ""
Some packages use
#define __func__ __FILE__
in this case. Not perfect, but still more informative than "".
Bruno
Hi Simon,
> What do you think?
The module is a worthy addition.
> I was unsure where to document this, it isn't either a function or
> header file, strictly speaking.
I would put its documentation in chapter "Particular modules". If/when
the 'inline' module gets documented, one might combine th
>From the gcc manual:
`__FUNCTION__' is another name for `__func__'. Older versions of GCC
recognize only this name. However, it is not standardized. For
maximum portability, we recommend you use `__func__', but provide a
fallback definition with the preprocessor:
#if __STDC_V
Hello,
In the absense of any objections, I have installed the following
changes:
2008-02-28 Sergey Poznyakoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* build-aux/bootstrap (source_base, m4_base)
(doc_base, tests_base): New variables.
(gnulib_tool_options): Do not hardcode base
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Thank you for the patch. That is indeed a typo.
> I've attached a patch adding a ChangeLog entry,
> for application to gnulib's git repository.
Thanks, applied.
> [Bruno, to apply this, you can remove the two '>' and then
> run "git am THIS_MESSAGE". ]
Which '>' should I
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Looks useful.
It's useful in few cases, to get the ultimate performance. getc_unlocked is
already quite good in performance.
> > const char *nl = (const char *) memchr (buf, '\n', n);
>
> Surely you meant this:
>
> const char *nl = (const char *) memc
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's one more module in the "stdio internals" series. freadptr (stream)
> returns a pointer to the read buffer of stream.
>
> For example, if you want to read the contents of the stream up to but not
> including the next newline into an obstack, h
Hi,
Here's one more module in the "stdio internals" series. freadptr (stream)
returns a pointer to the read buffer of stream.
For example, if you want to read the contents of the stream up to but not
including the next newline into an obstack, here's the naïve code:
struct obstack *obs = ...;
Atsushi SAKAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Jim
>
> I have two questions on gnulib in libvirt.
>
> 1)tupe is typo?(I attach a patch.)
> (I do not guess the correct words, it is jargon?)
Hi Atsushi,
Thank you for the patch. That is indeed a typo.
I've attached a patch adding a ChangeLog entr
15 matches
Mail list logo
