Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > Note that the following modules are not yet marked as LGPLv2+. I don't know
> > if you intended it like this.
> > crypto/arcfour:LGPL
> > crypto/arctwo:LGPL
> > crypto/hmac-md5:LGPL
> > crypto/hmac-sha1:LGPL
> > crypto/md5:LGPL
> > crypto/rijndael:LGPL
> > c
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>> First, human_options should probably not output to stderr or exit, but
>> should instead let the caller do it.
>
> Indeed; this allows to not increase the number of arguments to
> human_options from 3 to 4.
>
>> +static char opt_str_s
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I'm a little leery of this argument-transposing change:
>>
>> xstrtol The first two arguments of STRTOL_FATAL_ERROR
>> are now an option name and option argument
>>
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm a little leery of this argument-transposing change:
>
> xstrtol The first two arguments of STRTOL_FATAL_ERROR
> are now an option name and option argument
> instead of an option argument and a typ
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Bruce Korb wrote:
>> Aliases are turned off.
>> Below is an experiment. Invoke with and without an argument. The results
>> look like this:
>
> Your experiment uses the 'exit' command to test whether aliases are supported.
> However, 'exit' is a shell built-in. Whereas 'sed
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Any chance we could merge these? My idea with maint.mk was that it only
> contains generic rules no, and if you need project-specific rules,
> you'll add them. Thus, CoreUtils Makefile.maint could contain:
>
> include maint.mk
>
> and we could star
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> How about this?
>>
>> I haven't been following the re-licensing discussions closely (still
>> catching up), but these files seems to be used during the build phase,
>> and using the GPLv3 for that seems non-
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The week is over. I'm marking the modules that you specified as LGPLv2+.
> Except the tests, because they can be under GPL without problems, since they
> are not installed into libraries.
Thanks!
> Note that the following modules are not yet marked as L
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about this?
>
> I haven't been following the re-licensing discussions closely (still
> catching up), but these files seems to be used during the build phase,
> and using the GPLv3 for that seems non-controversial, or?
>
> Btw, libidn 1.0 (recently r
How about this?
I haven't been following the re-licensing discussions closely (still
catching up), but these files seems to be used during the build phase,
and using the GPLv3 for that seems non-controversial, or?
Btw, libidn 1.0 (recently released) uses latest gnulib, and there were
no license p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 8/6/2007 2:10 AM:
> Your experiment uses the 'exit' command to test whether aliases are supported.
> However, 'exit' is a shell built-in. Whereas 'sed' is not and will likely
> never be a shell built-in. Can you retry your
Bruce Korb wrote:
> Aliases are turned off.
> Below is an experiment. Invoke with and without an argument. The results
> look like this:
Your experiment uses the 'exit' command to test whether aliases are supported.
However, 'exit' is a shell built-in. Whereas 'sed' is not and will likely
never
12 matches
Mail list logo
