Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Simon Wing-Tang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> This time it sorted correctly and created the temporary files over
>> 2GB as follows
>
> Thanks for testing it. I installed that patch (enclosed again below)
> into gnulib and the coreutils CVS trunk.
(Sorry for the wide distribution, but I wasn't sure who would be
affected, and wanted to seek advice.)
Eric Blake from m4 (thanks Eric) asked about the coding standards:
And since dvi et. al are not invoked by 'make all', it is not
obvious whether 'make install-dvi' should depend on dvi o
"Simon Wing-Tang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This time it sorted correctly and created the temporary files over
> 2GB as follows
Thanks for testing it. I installed that patch (enclosed again below)
into gnulib and the coreutils CVS trunk. Jim, is it OK if I also
install this into the cor
On Tue, 23. May 2006, 21:44:20 +0200, Martin Lambers wrote:
> OK, I added a version for ftime().
Sorry, this version has a problem:
Newer versions of MinGW not only have
void _ftime (struct _timeb *timeptr);
but also
void ftime (struct timeb *timeptr); .
Thus both HAVE_FTIME and HAVE__FTIME are
