Hello,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 09:12:32AM -0400, Karl Berry wrote:
> The English seems fine to me, but since Gnulib has a Texinfo manual, it
> seems like it might make sense to use a multi-argument xref instead of
> @uref (with rewording), as in:
> @xref{Top,,,gnulib,Gnulib},
OTOH, is seems mo
Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
>>+ if (!req_version || strverscmp (req_version, VERSION) < 0)
>>+return VERSION;
>>
>>
>
> Why did you choose to call the version string "VERSION" rather than
> using the "PACKAGE_VERSION" string automatically defined by AC
Simon Josefsson wrote:
>No particular reason. VERSION is defined automatically by AC_INIT
>too, is it not? Is there a difference between PACKAGE_VERSION and
>VERSION? I'd be happy to change, it doesn't matter for me.
>
>
The CVS config.h is only showing `PACKAGE_VERSION'.
Regards,
Derek
Simon Josefsson wrote:
>Ok, unless someone suggests otherwise, I'll change it to
>PACKAGE_VERSION later tonight. Perhaps it is Automake that define
>VERSION.
>
>
The CVS project uses Automake 1.9.5 and Autoconf 2.59 and VERSION does
not get defined. We might not be using a macro that defines
Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
>>No particular reason. VERSION is defined automatically by AC_INIT
>>too, is it not? Is there a difference between PACKAGE_VERSION and
>>VERSION? I'd be happy to change, it doesn't matter for me.
>>
>>
>
> The CVS config.h is
+In case you want to use already existing files, you can have a look at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/, Gnulib}, a centralized
The English seems fine to me, but since Gnulib has a Texinfo manual, it
seems like it might make sense to use a multi-argument xref instead of
@u
Simon Josefsson wrote:
>+ if (!req_version || strverscmp (req_version, VERSION) < 0)
>+return VERSION;
>
>
Why did you choose to call the version string "VERSION" rather than
using the "PACKAGE_VERSION" string automatically defined by AC_INIT?
Regards,
Derek
__
FYI, I ran this command
(cd modules; ../check-module *)
and saw some new warnings:
lib/canonicalize.c: pathmax.h is `#include'd, but not listed in module's
Files: section
lib/fts.c: fts-cycle.c is `#include'd, but not listed in module's Files:
section
lib/fts.c: unistd-safer.h is `#inc
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:08:07PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 10:20:33PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > gnulib is an existing centralised repository, with implementations
> > > under various licenses, but mostly they are GPL or LGPL.
> >
> > Maybe there could b
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ah, right. I accidentally installed the m4 file. Ok to install the
>> rest too?
>
> Sure. It looks fine to me.
Done.
___
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
/* Check version of libgcrypt. */
if (!gcry_check_version (GCRYPT_VERSION))
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, right. I accidentally installed the m4 file. Ok to install the
> rest too?
Sure. It looks fine to me.
Thanks.
___
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-g
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>/* Check version of libgcrypt. */
>>>if (!gcry_check_version (GCRYPT_VERSION))
>>> die ("version mismatch\n");
>>
>> Can't you use str
13 matches
Mail list logo
