Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure I follow the higher-level language part... Perhaps I should
> explain more what I use this for.
>
> I use it in my libraries, which are all written in C. The source code
Thanks for explaining.
That's what I suspected.
What do you think about
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm using this module in all of my GNU packages. One complication
>> might be that it depends on VERSION being defined. Feedback
>> appreciated.
>
> Looks useful, but sounds like a job better implemented
> i
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using this module in all of my GNU packages. One complication
> might be that it depends on VERSION being defined. Feedback
> appreciated.
Looks useful, but sounds like a job better implemented
in a higher level language. But maybe you have const
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Index: lib/check_version.c
Just realized: it should #include check_version.h. Other than that, I
have now built and tested the module in one project.
___
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
http://
I'm using this module in all of my GNU packages. One complication
might be that it depends on VERSION being defined. Feedback
appreciated.
2005-06-25 Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* modules/check_version: New file.
2005-06-25 Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* che
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> In this case, I think naming me and Bruno as maintainer would be the
>> right thing. Ok?
>
> It's fine with me, though I'd like to hear Bruno's opinion.
Yup, I'll wait for Bruno's response.
>> Should we start replacing
>>
>> /* Get SIZE_MAX. */
>> #in
