Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the criteria for being listed as maintainer of a gnulib
> module? Wrote the code? Interested in supporting the code?
> Modularized the code? Wrote the module file? Gnulib developer?
Yes to all the above. :-)
The criteria aren't formal, b
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> How about this? The patch was discussed and revised a few times some
>> months ago. Nobody complained after the last patch was posted. I'll
>> install this on Sunday, unless someone complains.
>
> It seem
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I recall some compilers complaining about a trailing ','s. Is it
>> really OK by C89? I'm just curious.
>
> Yes, it is allowed in C89.
>
> Perhaps you're thinking of enumeration specifiers. The declaratio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes:
> Maybe we should just drop the text about '...' and "...", as it's kind
> of implied. Thus:
>
> In the C locale, GNU programs should stick to plain ASCII for
> quotation characters in messages to users: preferably 0x60 (`) for
> left quotes and 0x27 (
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How about this? The patch was discussed and revised a few times some
> months ago. Nobody complained after the last patch was posted. I'll
> install this on Sunday, unless someone complains.
It seems a bit odd for you to list Bruno as the maintaine
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I recall some compilers complaining about a trailing ','s. Is it
> really OK by C89? I'm just curious.
Yes, it is allowed in C89.
Perhaps you're thinking of enumeration specifiers. The declaration:
enum { zero, };
is not allowed in C89. (C99 al
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 01:16:50PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I recall some compilers complaining about a trailing ','s. Is it
> really OK by C89? I'm just curious.
Oddly, it's different for array initialisers and enums, but I can't
remember which is allowed and which is not.
James.
_
Paul Eggert wrote:
>Please install it in gnulib; it looks good to me. Thanks for
>following up on it.
>
>
Done:
2005-06-24 Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Remove stat module & update lstat.
* MODULES.html.sh (stat): Remove.
How about this? The patch was discussed and revised a few times some
months ago. Nobody complained after the last patch was posted. I'll
install this on Sunday, unless someone complains.
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2004-12-28 Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> *
| the application domain. For example, if source code deals with
| the French Revolutionary calendar, it is OK if its literal strings
Sounds good, thanks.
I assume you mean "punt the 'preferably'"?
Actually I meant "point out", ie, our text didn't just give `...' as one
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> The extra comma is an indication to the reader that we know there are
>> missing zeros, and don't care. This style can be used for any object
>> in C89, e.g.:
>>
>> mbstate_t initial_state = { 0, };
>>
>>
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The extra comma is an indication to the reader that we know there are
> missing zeros, and don't care. This style can be used for any object
> in C89, e.g.:
>
> mbstate_t initial_state = { 0, };
>
> where we don't know whether mbstate_t is a structure
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed the following disagreement between gnulib and coreutils:
>
> --- gnulib/lib/canon-host.c 2005-05-13 23:03:57 -0700
> +++ cu/lib/canon-host.c 2005-05-14 00:58:06 -0700
...
> I assume that this was due to a warning from "gcc -W" about a missi
13 matches
Mail list logo
