Eli Zaretskii writes:
> Thanks. Maybe Po Lu will have some ideas.
I mentioned one. I think a C profiler (e.g. gprof) would provide more
insightful data.
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> Po Lu, any other ideas or suggestions?
>
>> FYI there are other reports online of people noticing major latency in HiDPI
>> mode with the PGTK version, especially when the frame is fullscreen (so
>> there's more pixels to update):
>>
>> https://old.reddit.com/r/emacs/
On Tue, 3 Sep 2024, at 13:52, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:27:09 +0100
>> From: "Stephane Travostino"
>> Cc: 72...@debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> On Mon, 2 Sep 2024, at 13:12, Stephane Travostino wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2 Sep 2024, at 13:05, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> >>> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2
> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:36:44 +0100
> From: "Stephane Travostino"
> Cc: 72...@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > Please try profiling the lagging cases with "M-x profiler", and post
> > the profile here.
>
> I don't know how to make a consistent test case. I have tried here to profile
> opening Emacs (s
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024, at 13:12, Stephane Travostino wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2024, at 13:05, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 10:18:03 +0100
>>> From: "Stephane Travostino"
>>>
>>> Heavy operations, such as scrolling back and forth in a buffer, are
>>> noticeably laggier, for lack of b
> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:27:09 +0100
> From: "Stephane Travostino"
> Cc: 72...@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2024, at 13:12, Stephane Travostino wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Sep 2024, at 13:05, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >>> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 10:18:03 +0100
> >>> From: "Stephane Travostino"
> >>
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024, at 13:05, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 10:18:03 +0100
>> From: "Stephane Travostino"
>>
>> Heavy operations, such as scrolling back and forth in a buffer, are
>> noticeably laggier, for lack of better word, in the PGTK/Wayland version
>> than the X11, both te
> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 10:18:03 +0100
> From: "Stephane Travostino"
>
> Heavy operations, such as scrolling back and forth in a buffer, are
> noticeably laggier, for lack of better word, in the PGTK/Wayland version
> than the X11, both tested on KDE in Wayland mode.
>
> Affects both 29.2 and
Heavy operations, such as scrolling back and forth in a buffer, are
noticeably laggier, for lack of better word, in the PGTK/Wayland version
than the X11, both tested on KDE in Wayland mode.
Affects both 29.2 and the latest HEAD compiled a few days ago.
I am unsure whether it is a KDE or Emacs p
