Re: Missing links to the URW+ fonts in 8.64's fontmap

2009-07-03 Thread Karl Berry
> Artifex has incorporated the URW fonts directly in the Resources loaded > in memory by gs, I didn't know that. Thanks. > I've not included this fonts because I don't want to > have more included package in the executable than necessary. > > Any comments about this opti

Re: Missing links to the URW+ fonts in 8.64's fontmap

2009-07-03 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Salut Didier, Sorry for the late reply. Didier Link writes: > 2008-08-12 23:44:53.919723 Ray Johnston > Remove 'Actual Fonts' references in the Fontmap that connected > the URW FontName to an 8.3 filename that we no longer use. > [Resource/Init/Fontmap.GS] Who is "we"? :-)

Re: Missing links to the URW+ fonts in 8.64's fontmap

2009-06-23 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Karl, k...@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) writes: > No, that is not correct, as you can see since I just received your email > via bug-ghostscript. What happens is that the first time a sending > address mails to bug-ghostscript (and virtually all other GNU lists), a > human has to look at it a

Re: Missing links to the URW+ fonts in 8.64's fontmap

2009-06-22 Thread Didier Link
Le Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:03:00 +0200, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) a écrit : > Hello, > > With GNU Ghostscript 8.64, I noticed the following: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > $ gs user.ps > GNU Ghostscript 8.64 (2009-02-03) > Copyright (C) 2009 Artifex Soft

Re: Missing links to the URW+ fonts in 8.64's fontmap

2009-06-22 Thread Karl Berry
Hi Ludo, PS: `bug-ghostscr...@gnu.org' seems to be swallowing emails without ever publishing them No, that is not correct, as you can see since I just received your email via bug-ghostscript. What happens is that the first time a sending address mails to bug-ghostscript (and virtually