Re: Ghostscript is vulnerable to CVE-2010-1628

2010-07-25 Thread Didier LINK
> Hi Markus, > > The bug-ghostscript list was configured to be very picky about > attachments, so your second one didn't come through either. I just > changed the list config. If you haven't already just sent it to Didier, > please resend once more. Sorry. > > Didier, any ETA on a new GNU gs

Re: Ghostscript is vulnerable to CVE-2010-1628

2010-07-21 Thread Karl Berry
Hi Markus, The bug-ghostscript list was configured to be very picky about attachments, so your second one didn't come through either. I just changed the list config. If you haven't already just sent it to Didier, please resend once more. Sorry. Didier, any ETA on a new GNU gs release? Thanks,

Re: Ghostscript is vulnerable to CVE-2010-1628

2010-07-21 Thread Markus Steinborn
Markus Steinborn wrote: The attached patch (backported to Ghostscript 8.71 from upstream SVN by Redhat) should fix it. I did not get any patch in that mail, so once again... Thanks Markus Steinborn GNU gv maintainer