document chgrp: changing group of `m': Operation not permitted

2008-01-05 Thread jidanni
Hope the chgrp and chown docs mention some operating systems don't let just anyone just change to any group... chgrp: changing group of `m': Operation not permitted version 5.97 ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/m

cat - -

2008-01-15 Thread jidanni
Bet you don't document anywhere that/why $ echo a|cat - - will only give one "a". Or maybe even raise an error... ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Re: cat - -

2008-01-15 Thread jidanni
MF> what were you expecting to happen ? it is not possible for cat to MF> re-read stdin once it has consumed it. Yes, but you don't document it I bet. At least not in the path that starts with man cat. Just reading the coreutils docs, one wouldn't know why $ date|cat q b - c q - q - b worked exce

Re: cat - -

2008-01-15 Thread jidanni
Yes yes. I'm just saying supposing a theoretical new user's first encounter with all this stuff was the document trail that started with the cat man page, then he would think "-" was broken. So still an understanding of Unix is implied as the docs perhaps describe 95% but not yet 100% of what one

Re: cat - -

2008-01-15 Thread jidanni
J> But the main problem is to figure out where to put such a document J> so that new users will actually read it. What do you think? Somewhere around $ info -o - coreutils|grep -C 2 Intro ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://list

tail(1) --no-free-bonus- "clarity separator lines"

2008-01-23 Thread jidanni
Gentlemen, your assignment: tell me how many blank lines are at the end of each file: $ tail -n 3 sd? ==> sd1 <== =_1201017022-21167-0 ==> sd2 <== =_1201077677-7431-0-- ==> sd3 <== =_1201017022-21167-0 $ tail -n 3 sd{3,2,1} #let's try again, shall we? ==>

Re: tail(1) --no-free-bonus- "clarity separator lines"

2008-01-23 Thread jidanni
EB> Consider upgrading (we've told you this before). The latest stable EB> version of coreutils is 6.10. OK, I'll tell debian to get in chime with the times, http://bugs.debian.org/462340 EB> What are you suggesting? Maybe something like --omit-blank-line-at-separator. Anyway make sure it is sho

Re: ls --group-directories-first -U

2008-02-11 Thread jidanni
J> Would you *please* consider sending a precise suggestion Sorry. OK, To both man page: --group-directories-first group directories before files And info page: `--group-directories-first' Group all the directories before the files and then sort the directories and

ls --group-directories-first -U

2008-02-11 Thread jidanni
Mention in the ls docs at --group-directories-first, that "-U nullifies its effects, sorry" :-) ls (GNU coreutils) 6.10 ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Re: ls --group-directories-first -U

2008-02-12 Thread jidanni
JM> +(@option{-U}) disables this option altogether. Looks good. JM> + disable with --sort=none (-U);\n\ Looks bad. One thinks "disable by not using it in the first place". Just word it like the first one above. Yes the options are so complicated that one needs a n-to-the-nth-power grid chart to s

cut: invalid option -- [BLANKS]

2008-02-12 Thread jidanni
$ cut -s' ' cut: invalid option -- Try `cut --help' for more information. What do you mean, " "? I typed an -s. Give a proper error message. ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Re: cut: invalid option -- [BLANKS]

2008-02-14 Thread jidanni
Ok, reported http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5762 I bet I will get nasty glibc email, so I leave it in your guys hands. ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

chown should catch null owner:group

2008-02-15 Thread jidanni
Please don't let me get away with # chown : file... # chown -R : file... # chown . file... # chown -R . file... without raising an error. "The user thought -R meant --reference. He returned on Monday to find a pink slip on his desk as the boss was not able to access the presentation." ___

Re: chown should catch null owner:group

2008-02-15 Thread jidanni
P> Is this just an academic worry, or were you really bitten by it? Yes. About once a year I do chown -R . file, thinking that -R meant recursive, oops, I mean "reference"... never expecting it to "work if it doesn't work", as with most commands, if it doesn't complain, then it must have worked, a

bug#8241: closed (Date does not exist in that timezone)

2011-07-10 Thread jidanni
GbTS> Well, there's your answer. You were probably asking for a date/time that GbTS> did not exist due to the daylight savings time skip. OK, but maybe the error message should give more details, as it would usually be very hard for the user to guess such a rare occurrence.

bug#9207: nice -n man page clarifications

2011-07-30 Thread jidanni
Say more clearly what default it is you are talking about. Some may think all processes have a default niceness of 10. -n, --adjustment=N - add integer N to the niceness (default 10) + add integer N to the niceness. + No -n INT is the same as giving -n

bug#9228: Shorthand on the sort page

2011-08-02 Thread jidanni
Shorthand on the sort page --sort=WORD sort according to WORD: general-numeric -g, human-numeric -h, month -M, numeric -n, random -R, version -V is not going to be understood by the beginner. Sorry. Only the Info page makes it clear what you are trying to sa

bug#9263: mv overwrite message when owner different

2011-08-08 Thread jidanni
This message, mv: try to overwrite `/cf/updates/F.cpio.gz', overriding mode 0644 (rw-r--r--)? y does not make it clear that the file owner is different. mv (GNU coreutils) 8.5

bug#9325: document that "all bets are off if the file contains non-unique join fields"

2011-08-18 Thread jidanni
Mention in the join(1) documents that "all bets are off if the file contains non-unique join fields", e.g., a b b c Also mention if you get this email.

bug#9326: Bug#638388: update bug addresses to point to bug-coreutils instead

2011-08-18 Thread jidanni
Package: findutils X-debbugs-Cc: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Version: 4.5.10-1 Severity: minor According to http://article.gmane.org/gmane.discuss/14277 any mention of e.g., bug-findutils should be updated throughout this and other affected packages.

bug#9326: gmane.comp.gnu.fileutils.bugs - discontinued list - mark read-only?

2011-08-18 Thread jidanni
Ah ha, reading http://article.gmane.org/gmane.discuss/14277 I thought EA> bug-sh-ut...@gnu.org EA> bug-textut...@gnu.org EA> bug-fileut...@gnu.org EA> have been replaced by EA> bug-coreutils@gnu.org i.e., 3->1 when in fact, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638388#1

bug#9327: searching coreutils archives gives "can't open the index"

2011-08-18 Thread jidanni
I see this upon search at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=jidanni&submit=Search!&max=20&result=normal&sort=date:late Search String: [jidanni ] Search! Display: [20 ] Description: [normal] Sort: [in reverse chronological

bug#9326: update bug addresses to point to bug-coreutils instead

2011-08-18 Thread jidanni
OK It all started when that guy at gmane got the history backward.

bug#9325: closed (Re: bug#9325: document that "all bets are off if the file contains non-unique join fields")

2011-08-19 Thread jidanni
OK, glad to know they are supported. Indeed, $ join <(printf "%s\n" 'a 1' 'b 2' 'b 3' 'c 4') <(printf "%s\n" a b 'b 5' c c) a 1 b 2 b 2 5 b 3 b 3 5 c 4 c 4 So be sure to mention it wherever you mention files must be in sorted order. I mean probably if you don't mention it, nobody will be sure wh

bug#10253: mention +FORMAT in ls time style reminder help blurb

2011-12-08 Thread jidanni
$ ls -t1 --time-style=%c -og ls: invalid argument `%c' for `time style' Valid arguments are: - `full-iso' - `long-iso' - `iso' - `locale' <-you forgot to also mention "+FORMAT" Try `ls --help' for more information. $ ls -t1 --time-style=+%c -og

bug#10253: mention +FORMAT in ls time style reminder help blurb

2011-12-10 Thread jidanni
Well wherever you say 4/5ths of something that means the other 1/5th does not exist, so it would be better to say nothing.

bug#10253: mention +FORMAT in ls time style reminder help blurb

2011-12-11 Thread jidanni
Thanks!

bug#10253: mention +FORMAT in ls time style reminder help blurb

2011-12-12 Thread jidanni
> "JM" == Jim Meyering writes: JM> is misleading in that it might encourage someone to use the []'s. Like You Know Who :-), who also recommends you figure out a way to get rid of the JM> $ src/ls -l --time-style=x "src/" even in these e-mails/commits, as it is bad for the eye, even though

bug#10253: mention +FORMAT in ls time style reminder help blurb

2011-12-12 Thread jidanni
> "JM" == Jim Meyering writes: JM> Hence, including that prefix shows what I've done. Without it, JM> the reader would wonder if I'd simply used whatever ls is in my path, JM> which could easily represent a mistake. Well OK then.

bug#10363: /etc/mtab -> /proc/mounts symlink affects df(1) output for /

2011-12-24 Thread jidanni
The new symlink on Debian, $ ls -og /etc/mtab lrwxrwxrwx 1 12 12-23 22:00 /etc/mtab -> /proc/mounts Has caused $ df Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed Available Use% Mounted on rootfs 1071468 287940

bug#11809: document "So how do we just simply make a backup file?"

2012-06-28 Thread jidanni
(info "(coreutils) Backup options") should add some examples, for "So how do we make a backup file of m?" $ ls m $ cp -b m m #no go $ cp m n $ mv -b n m

bug#11809: document "So how do we just simply make a backup file?"

2012-06-28 Thread jidanni
OK but (info "(coreutils) Backup options") should also link back to the exact cp -b spot, else most folks will miss it. P.S., There _is_ an easier way of making backups of several files, But there is a bug, one has to do it one at a time despite -b. Bug bug bug. $ \cp -fb h k l . cp: `h' and `./

bug#11809: document "So how do we just simply make a backup file?"

2012-06-29 Thread jidanni
JM> I deliberately restricted the "make backup only" functionality to the JM> very limited case that is documented. Well you had better explicitly document that it does not work with all forms in the cp SYNOPSIS, else people will think it is broken...

bug#11903: fold should mention what happens if the command is used on multibyte characters

2012-07-10 Thread jidanni
(info "(coreutils) fold invocation") should mention what happens if the command is used on multibyte characters. The man page should too.

bug#11994: sort(1) doesn't say SEE ALSO uniq(1)

2012-07-19 Thread jidanni
sort(1) doesn't say SEE ALSO uniq(1), and vice versa.

bug#13216: head(1) man page not talking about kilobytes

2012-12-17 Thread jidanni
Man you guys are bananas using "K" here: -c, --bytes=[-]K print the first K bytes of each file; with the leading `-', print all but the last K bytes of each file Why can't you use "X" etc. etc.? It took 15 minutes for me to figure out that you weren't talk

bug#13216: head(1) man page not talking about kilobytes

2012-12-17 Thread jidanni
OK, then use "NUMBERS" instead of "K". Something, anything. I swear I changed my Xquery script several times wondering why it was only printing the first character instead of 1000.

bug#13216: head(1) man page not talking about kilobytes

2012-12-17 Thread jidanni
Anyway your man pages must make sense over the telephone. Everybody knows K bytes is kilobytes. You are all under arrest. I'm sending this to Risks Digest.

bug#13216: notsp: Everybody knows K bytes is kilobytes

2012-12-17 Thread jidanni
$ man head ... print the first K bytes of each file... I could have sworn they were talking about kilobytes, but no, they were talking about the first K bytes. http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13216

bug#13216: notsp: Everybody knows K bytes is kilobytes

2012-12-17 Thread jidanni
OK indeed "print the first K bytes of each file" would mean something like "print the first FEW kilobytes of each file," like "pluck the first K leaves off of each tree" naa... that would mean "pluck the first 1000 leaves off of each tree" Anyways, the busy executive just glances at these quick re

bug#14231: mv, rm, cp -i need super clear explanation of -i...

2013-04-18 Thread jidanni
$ rm -i * rm: remove regular file `Ph_D_Thesis'? you had better ask my mother $ ls $ I think the info pages should make very clear what is going on in this case, to avoid legal threats one day.

bug#14686: Bug#713022: truncate man and info pages must mention -s / -r mandatory

2013-06-21 Thread jidanni
Package: coreutils Version: 8.13-3.3 File: /usr/share/man/man1/truncate.1.gz X-debbugs-CC: bug-coreutils@gnu.org $ truncate /tmp/erere truncate: you must specify either `--size' or `--reference' What a shock. Not mentioned on man or info pages! And truncate OPTION... FILE... should be

bug#14686: Bug#713022: truncate man and info pages must mention -s / -r mandatory

2013-06-22 Thread jidanni
I thought it would do the obvious, like touch does. NAME touch - change file timestamps SYNOPSIS touch [OPTION]... FILE... DESCRIPTION Update the access and modification times of each FILE to the current time. A FILE argument that does not exist is created

bug#14686: Bug#713022: truncate man and info pages must mention -s / -r mandatory

2013-06-22 Thread jidanni
Well I bet that rm is as evil.

bug#14846: dd how to skip one byte from reading the man page

2013-07-11 Thread jidanni
If the user tries to figure out how to skip one byte just from reading the dd man page, and not info, in order to finally figure out how to do $ echo abc|dd ibs=1 skip=1 bc it seems ibs=BYTES read up to BYTES bytes at a time (default: 512) should be instead ibs=BYTES

bug#14971: split man page table mushed

2013-07-27 Thread jidanni
Package: coreutils Version: 8.21-1 File: /usr/share/man/man1/split.1.gz .PP CHUNKS may be: N split into N files based on size of input K/N output Kth of N to stdout l/N split into N files without splitting lines l/K/N output Kth of N to stdout without splitting lines r/N like '

bug#14971: bug tracking numbers for split man page bug

2013-07-27 Thread jidanni
718...@bugs.debian.org 14...@debbugs.gnu.org

bug#14972: cp docs should mention permissions result when destination already exists

2013-07-27 Thread jidanni
Fellows, I don't think (info "(coreutils) cp invocation") mentions how $ touch m $ cp m n $ chmod 444 m $ cp m n #THESE LINES $ cp m p #MAKE DIFFERENT THINGS $ ls -l -r--r--r-- 1 jidanni jidanni 0 07-28 11:20 m -rw-r--r-- 1 jidanni jidanni 0 07-28 11:21 n -r--r--r-- 1 jidanni jidann

bug#14972: cp docs should mention permissions result when destination already exists

2013-07-28 Thread jidanni
Thanks.

bug#14996: man uniq -d mention more

2013-07-31 Thread jidanni
man uniq: -d, --repeated only print duplicate lines ADD: , one for each group. Even though the Info page says something.

bug#15040: comm --check-order doc boost

2013-08-06 Thread jidanni
In (info "(coreutils) comm invocation") mention that even with --check-order there can still be some erroneous output emitted before the error is detected. Therefore check first with sort -c to be sure...

bug#15040: closed (Re: bug#15040: comm --check-order doc boost)

2013-08-07 Thread jidanni
Fine, when we produce an erroneous death row list, don't blame me...

bug#15055: shuf --all-permutations

2013-08-08 Thread jidanni
(info "(coreutils) shuf invocation") says These examples all have four input lines, so `shuf' might produce any of the twenty-four possible permutations of the input. In general, if there are N input lines, there are N! (i.e., N factorial, or N * (N - 1) * ... * 1) possible output per

bug#15066: ./configure && make && make install

2013-08-09 Thread jidanni
I note a lot of packages come with Installation Instructions * Copyright (C) 1994-1996, 1999-2002, 2004-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification, are permitted in any medium without

bug#15068: `seq' prints the numbers from FIRST to (maybe almost) LAST by INCREMENT

2013-08-10 Thread jidanni
(info "(coreutils) seq invocation") ... seq [OPTION]... FIRST INCREMENT LAST `seq' prints the numbers from FIRST to LAST by INCREMENT. By default, each number is printed on a separate line. When INCREMENT is not specified, it defaults to `1', even when FIRST is larger tha

bug#15232: cp -i a/s b/s c

2013-09-01 Thread jidanni
$ cp -i a/s b/s c cp: overwrite ‘c/s’? y cp: will not overwrite just-created ‘c/s’ with ‘b/s’ Mmmm OK, but maybe don't ask then.

bug#15232: cp -i a/s b/s c

2013-09-01 Thread jidanni
All I know is that if it is smart enough to say >> cp: will not overwrite just-created ‘c/s’ with ‘b/s’ which is indeed rather smart, then it should be smart enough to gather all its thoughts together before presenting them to the user. Hmmm, then it should be also smart enough to recognize the col

bug#15232: cp -i a/s b/s c

2013-09-19 Thread jidanni
> "JM" == Jim Meyering writes: JM> enough that without it, cp is vulnerable to a subtle type of exploit. Well some word about this should be in some footnote in the cp INFO manual.

bug#15232: cp -i a/s b/s c

2013-09-20 Thread jidanni
> "BV" == Bernhard Voelker writes: BV> So I don't think the man or info pages are the right place. Huh? Hush hush for security, or just not to bog the pages down? BV> BTW: I'm not sure if we're talking about two different things now: (All one big blur to me anyway.)

bug#15232: cp -i a/s b/s c

2013-09-20 Thread jidanni
> "BV" == Bernhard Voelker writes: BV> No, there is no (known) security problem.  Please read Jim's message OK then the ought to add a footnote to the docs.

bug#15650: "cp: warning: source file ‘f’ specified more than once" said more than once too!

2013-10-19 Thread jidanni
$ touch f $ mkdir w $ cp f f f w cp: warning: source file ‘f’ specified more than once cp: warning: source file ‘f’ specified more than once Hey, you yourself say that more than once itself! So either say cp: warning: source file ‘f’ specified more than once just once, or say cp: warning: source

None

2003-03-18 Thread jidanni
Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pr: -T wipes out any meaning of -l From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 08:50:58 +0800 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charse

<    1   2