screen
20671 wait4 bash
20684 schedule_timeout mc
20686 wait4 bash
22742 down shred
22743 wait4 bash
22767 - ps
Unfortunatelly I do not undersand it :-). Whar does it mean?
Best regards,
Adam
-
bc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
#5 0x40033555 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
#6 0x080482b1 in ?? ()
This seems to work as it should.
Best regards,
Adam
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging P
file), but instead produce a warning and
return true.
I have attached a patch against the git master. Please review and
consider it's inclusion.
I apologise if there is an issue with this report as it is my first time
submitting a patch to coreutils.
Thanks,
Adam Shore
Submitted by: Adam
rms. That's the case you're trying to
> avoid here right, or is there a more practical concern?
Yes, this is what I meant. I know it's a rare scenario however I thought
I would still mention it as I can not see harm in adding a check in.
Apologies for any confusion.
Thanks,
Adam
Try using echo to output the string '-e' or '-E' or '-n' literally. You
can't. Furthermore try executing `echo -e [-eEn]...`. Nothing but a
blank line.
The patch below utilizes a familiar technique (used, e.g., in grep) to
escape arguments; however, admittedly it can be rendered more elegan
goto just_echo;
+ }
+}
+
/* If it appears that we are handling options, then make sure that
all of the options specified are actually valid. Otherwise, the
string should just be echoed. */
=== END PATCH ===
Adam Rosenwald wrote:
Try using echo to output the string
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since you guys are interested in AFS, I'm hoping one of you will
> respond to the above.
http://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2008-April/029132.html
> I'll wait a few days, after which, if I don't hear anything, I'll
> just revert to the old
ere is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Written by David MacKenzie and Jim Meyering.
Thanks,
Adam Hayes
___
Adam Hayes
University of Rochester
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
RC Box Number 270171
Rochester, NY 1462
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Adam Jimerson on 12/26/2008 4:14 PM:
>
> Thanks for the report. However, coreutils use GNU getopt semantics, where
> unambiguous abbreviations of long options are recognized. Therefore, you
> need no
This seems like it would be a simple feature and while it may overlap
with (or be slightly redundant to) the sort command, sorting
lexicographically, i.e., foo1, foo2, foo10, foo20 instead of foo1,
foo10, foo2, foo20, would be a nice feature to have.
--adam
I am running macosx 10.4 with newly installed xcode tools. Make
check failed. I am providing the first ~20 lines of config.log and
the last ~50 lines of the output of 'make check.' Let me know if you
want any other information. (I ran make install and everything seems
to be working fine
test -v, test --version, test -h, and test --help do not work. they just
return me to the command line. i have tried GNU sh-utils 2.0, coreutils
5.2.1 and coreutils 5.0. i wasn't aware of a newer version out to try. other
people on irc have confirmed that their versions also fail to output
anything
for sending reports to
bug-coreutils@gnu.org - so here you are :-)
Please tell me if you can help me somehow? Do you need any additional
information?
Best regards,
Adam Waltman
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http
Hello Bob, Paul
BP> Adam Waltman wrote:
>> I am trying to install coreutils-5.94 on my Gentoo system.
>> It fails during test stage. I have entered the error report here:
>> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-3262580.html#3262580
BP> Which links to the bug
difference beetween using code created be someone (downloading, compiling,
installing)
and digging in the code on my own :-)
So the tips how should I use gdb were really heplful.
Here is the output
k13 coreutils-5.94 # gdb -x <( printf "run\nbt" ) --args
src/shred --remove --zero adam adam1
G
lp once again.
I have updated the Gentoo bugzilla
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130246
now I am waiting for the patched version to appear in Gentoo repository.
Best regards,
Adam
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
should. So why would running the command in bash be different?
My machine:
Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) x86_64
Kernel 2.6.15
coreutils-5.2.1-48
bash-3.0-31
Please cc me in the response, I am not currently subscribed to the mailing
list. Thanks!
Cheers,
Adam Miller
E_XATTR to "yes" if attr support is enabled, but copy.c and cp.c use
"#if USE_XATTR"/"#if !USE_XATTR" to test it. The attached patch changes
these to use #ifdef/#ifndef, which makes the testsuite pass for me.
Thanks,
--
Adam Sampson <http
filesystem
supports fiemap when it doesn't, so the tests that use it fail.
I'm not sure at this point whether df -t is doing the wrong thing or
fiemap_capable_ is using it incorrectly. Any thoughts?
Thanks very much,
--
Adam Sampson <http://offog.org/>
nd regards
Yours sincerely
Adam Jasinski BAppIS, MMus
Practical Education Institute (NZ) Ltd
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
phone: +64 6 759 0670 ext 3532
DISCLAIMER:
This e-mail message and accompanying data may contain information that is
confidentia
Sorry,
Please forget about this email
Yours sincerely
Adam Jasinski
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
phone: +64 6 759 0670 ext 3532
_
From: Adam Jasinski
Sent: Friday, 16 November 2007 10:27 a.m.
To: 'bug-coreutils@gnu.org'
Subject: who c
Hi,
Right now, dd uses strchr to do some parsing of argv. This messes up how
dd appears in ps.
Here is a very simple solution to this problem. Yes, it does not free
memory. But does it matter? dd is just a standalone application.
(Pointed out by Benjamin Gilbert.)
Adam
---
src/dd.c |2
numbers. eg 0xF it might be nice if the factors were in the same base
as the input, or if there was a flag to control the output radix...
Adam
t with awk, perl
or maybe even bc if you were creative, but it just makes things less
convenient to chain if the default or only output is not directly
compatibile with the main consuming next in the chain tools natural, default
or only input...
Adam
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 09:54:39AM +0200,
$> date
Sun Jan 17 22:49:40 EST 2016
$> date -d"04:00"
Sun Jan 17 04:00:00 EST 2016
$> date -d"04:00 +1 day"
Sun Jan 17 22:00:00 EST 2016
To fix this, a work around for me now is:
$> date -d"$(date -d"04:00") +1 day"
Mon Jan 18 04:00:00 EST 2016
+AMD
obably be that if
you are going to be friendly and presume that +1 is a shorthand
timezone shift that you should do so after you have parsed the
date string for more expected syntaxes.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> tag 22397 notabug
> close
>
> On 18/01/16 03:5
0xfe534d42 for 'errors.log'. please report
this to bug-coreutils@gnu.org. reverting to polling
Kind regards,
Adam Solymos
Software Developer
ESPC
Tel: 0131 624 8000
90a George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 3DF
Website<https://espc.com/> | Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/espc.propert
Hi!
I'm afraid that `nproc` shows only the number of _currently_ online CPUs,
which on mobile processors tends to be 1 when starting a job. As there's
a need to conserve power, holding cores online when they have nothing to
do would be a waste, thus they constantly get onlined and offlined.
For e
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 07:26:16PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 25/06/2020 18:37, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Hi!
> > I'm afraid that `nproc` shows only the number of _currently_ online CPUs,
> > which on mobile processors tends to be 1 when starting a job. As ther
html>.
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Written by Torbjorn Granlund and Richard M. Stallman.
Thanks so much for your help forwarding this to anybody who might be able
to confirm and ideally resolv
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 7:14 PM Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 4/24/22 07:40, Adam Holt wrote:
>
> > split (GNU coreutils) 8.32
>
> That's an old version, dated 2020. Please try the current version
> coreutils 9.1, which has bug fixes in this area.
Wow, coreutils 9.1 indeed
.4), which is missing its
modules dependency file (modules.dep), but now find
"Tux:~# /usr/sbin/mkinitrd -m /boot/initrd.img-2.6.5-1-686 -o 2.6.5custom
/usr/sbin/mkinitrd line 1: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.5-1-686: Permission denied"
Am I missing something here - or a bug ?
Adam Bogacki,
[EMAIL PROT
32 matches
Mail list logo