les.
Is this something that was "fixed" so that a later version of
Suse might have a df that works? If so, I might just allow the
user to override the space checking in the event he has an
affected system.
Thanks,
Kevin R. Bulgrien
Juergen Weigert wrote:
> Hi coreutils people!
>
>
nd for a shell script? Not
sure what questions to ask. I never heard of df doing this before,
though now I see it is apparently not df per se. What is a shell
script to do?
Thanks,
Kevin R. Bulgrien
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
or me to make sure the media is mounted so df will report
what it needs to report. I already issued the mount command, so from
the script's (and my) perspective it should be still mounted when df
runs.
Thanks,
Kevin R. Bulgrien
kbulgrien (at) att dot net
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
u explicitly mounted. All I am looking for is an idea of the most
sane way to script something so I can get what I want from df on a
system that is configured like the Suse systems that spawned the
thread in the first place. I just have not encountered this type
of situation before.
Kevin R. Bulgrien
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
> Hello my name is Tari, and I am a novice on this unix. My problem bug is
> that I am also getting the message
>
> join: too many non-option agruments, when I am trying to join to files.
>
> For example:
> join -t: -a1 -j1 1 -j2 1 pnn pnum > pacetrep
The man page says that -j takes one value. Yo