Re: Bash vs. sh

2008-04-20 Thread Joel E. Denny
Coreutils maintainers, It appears that Bison's bootstrap script is occasionally sync'ed against Coreutils'. Paul Hilfinger, one of the Bison developers, recently made the discovery quoted below, which I figure might also be relevant to Coreutils. On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Joel

Re: Bash vs. sh

2008-04-22 Thread Joel E. Denny
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Jim Meyering wrote: > > as the preferred method for getting started, avoiding the need to check in > > bootstrap? Or even have a two-level bootstrap: ./bootstrap is a simple > > checked-in wrapper which portably calls autom4te on bootstrap_inner.m4sh > > then runs bootstrap_i

Re: Bash vs. sh

2008-04-22 Thread Joel E. Denny
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Jim Meyering wrote: > "Joel E. Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's already a bootstrap module in gnulib. You mean build-aux/bootstrap? > We sync things around periodically. I was hoping for something more formal: all developers comm

Re: Bash vs. sh

2008-04-23 Thread Joel E. Denny
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Jim Meyering wrote: > > I was hoping for something more formal: all developers commit their > > bootstrap-inner.m4sh changes to gnulib instead of to their own projects. > > That's already the idea, using gnulib's bootstrap. Ok, thanks. I wasn't aware. > > Writing bootstrap

Re: Bash vs. sh

2008-05-06 Thread Joel E. Denny
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Eric Blake wrote: > I'm not quite sure what is best to do here. It seems like the simplest > wrapper might be this untested script (short enough to possibly be worth > distributing without copyright notice, since adding the notice would > double its size): > > #!/bin/sh > if

Re: copyright years: mass-update every January 1

2009-07-27 Thread Joel E. Denny
possible comment styles, the following patch manually concatenates the copyright statement lines in the affected files. Unfortunately, after many years, copyright statements might wrap around the margin several times, but I guess that's a small price. >From 4773a2257e67950f9a0713f7a1cde16f1

Re: copyright years: mass-update every January 1

2009-07-29 Thread Joel E. Denny
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Jim Meyering wrote: > Joel E. Denny wrote: > > I'd like to use this in Bison. Would you consider contributing > > build-aux/update-copyright to gnulib so we don't maintain separate copies? > > Sure. Thanks. I'll watch for that. In

Re: copyright years: mass-update every January 1

2009-07-29 Thread Joel E. Denny
ble to extend this further to automatically format the added text. I might work on that some other time. >From ed7de5b95ddc6888592dbe8f38f77b2a6fd83bc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel E. Denny Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:59:34 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] maint: generalize update-copyright's

Re: new module: update-copyright [Re: copyright years: mass-update every January 1

2009-07-29 Thread Joel E. Denny
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Jim Meyering wrote: > Joel E. Denny wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Jim Meyering wrote: > > > >> Joel E. Denny wrote: > > > >> > I'd like to use this in Bison. Would you consider contributing > >> > buil

Re: new module: update-copyright [Re: copyright years: mass-update every January 1

2009-07-30 Thread Joel E. Denny
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Jim Meyering wrote: > Thank you! Thank you. :) > Here's an incremental change I'm about to fold into yours. > It changes "comment" to "prefix" and adjusts syntax. Makes sense. > There remains at least one infelicity: if someone discusses > the Copyright (C) notation (e.g.

Re: new module: update-copyright [Re: copyright years: mass-update every January 1

2009-07-31 Thread Joel E. Denny
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Joel E. Denny wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Jim Meyering wrote: > > There remains at least one infelicity: if someone discusses > > the Copyright (C) notation (e.g., as on this line), and later > > has the copyright-with-dates line, the prefixes may no

Re: copyright years: mass-update every January 1

2009-08-13 Thread Joel E. Denny
nd more importantly, we should also fix the tool to allow longhand years > for maintainers that want longhand). Below are some patches to implement that. >From 75dd6c0c64ee03ebb4eb7b0b14cf8905b9ad65ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel E. Denny Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:40:34 -0400 Subjec

Re: copyright years: mass-update every January 1

2009-08-14 Thread Joel E. Denny
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Jim Meyering wrote: > > Below are some patches to implement that. > ... > > +2009-08-14 Joel E. Denny > > + > > + update-copyright: convert 2-digit to 4-digit years > > + * build-aux/update-copyright: Implement and document. > &g

Re: copyright years: mass-update every January 1

2009-08-14 Thread Joel E. Denny
't know how to configure update-copyright permanently for a project. The following patch gives me a way. >From cf17e05d931eb3e7d995650eb01c354533c61886 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel E. Denny Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:26:20 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] maint.mk: support update-copyright-env *